Look at these examples to see how participle clauses are used.
Looked after carefully, these boots will last for many years.
Not wanting to hurt his feelings, I avoided the question.
Having lived through difficult times together, they were very close friends.
Try this exercise to test your grammar.
- Grammar test 1
Read the explanation to learn more.
Grammar explanation
Participle clauses enable us to say information in a more economical way. They are formed using present participles (going, reading, seeing, walking, etc.), past participles (gone, read, seen, walked, etc.) or perfect participles (having gone, having read, having seen, having walked, etc.).
We can use participle clauses when the participle and the verb in the main clause have the same subject. For example,
Waiting for Ellie, I made some tea. (While I was waiting for Ellie, I made some tea.)
Participle clauses do not have a specific tense. The tense is indicated by the verb in the main clause.
Participle clauses are mainly used in written texts, particularly in a literary, academic or journalistic style.
Present participle clauses
Here are some common ways we use present participle clauses. Note that present participles have a similar meaning to active verbs.
- To give the result of an action
The bomb exploded, destroying the building. - To give the reason for an action
Knowing she loved reading, Richard bought her a book. - To talk about an action that happened at the same time as another action
Standing in the queue, I realised I didn't have any money. - To add information about the subject of the main clause
Starting in the new year, the new policy bans cars in the city centre.
Past participle clauses
Here are some common ways that we use past participle clauses. Note that past participles normally have a passive meaning.
- With a similar meaning to an if condition
Used in this way, participles can make your writing more concise. (If you use participles in this way, … ) - To give the reason for an action
Worried by the news, she called the hospital. - To add information about the subject of the main clause
Filled with pride, he walked towards the stage.
Perfect participle clauses
Perfect participle clauses show that the action they describe was finished before the action in the main clause. Perfect participles can be structured to make an active or passive meaning.
Having got dressed, he slowly went downstairs.
Having finished their training, they will be fully qualified doctors.
Having been made redundant, she started looking for a new job.
Participle clauses after conjunctions and prepositions
It is also common for participle clauses, especially with -ing, to follow conjunctions and prepositions such as before, after, instead of, on, since, when, while and in spite of.
Before cooking, you should wash your hands.
Instead of complaining about it, they should try doing something positive.
On arriving at the hotel, he went to get changed.
While packing her things, she thought about the last two years.
In spite of having read the instructions twice, I still couldn’t understand how to use it.
Do this exercise to test your grammar again.
- Grammar test 2
Hello LearnEnglish team,
Is it correct to use 'him' after 'told' in the following sentence? I would appreciate an explanation of why it is correct or incorrect.
Not having been told him how to deal with his career challenges, he could not proceed well through the year.
Hello Sep80,
It is not correct to use 'him' here. The reason is that 'Having been told' is a passive form, so there is no object after it. It is a participle here so the actor is identified only in the second clause ('he could not proceed...'), but it is still grammatically incorrect to add an object. It would be similar to saying 'He was told him...'
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi, could you please answer this question 🌱
The old woman walked slowly to the elevator, assisted by porter
is this sentence a reduced relative clause ?
i mean : , which she was assisted by porter
my second question: can we reduce this kind of non-defining relative pronouns?
Hello hanieh1315,
No, that's not a reduced relative clause. Adding 'which she was assisted by the porter' is not grammatically correct.
Since the clause refers to the old woman rather than the elevator, it would best go at the beginning of the sentence:
In this position, it's also easier to see that it's a past participle clause, as described in the explanation above. It gives information about the subject of the main clause.
Does that make sense?
All the best,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
I’m really thankful. got it🌹
Sorry, i made a mistake.
i wanted to say this sentence
The old woman walked slowly to the elevator, which was assisted by the porter
Now, is this correct?( reduced non-defining relative clause)
Hello again hanieh1315,
I'm afraid that sentence doesn't make sense to me. It means that the porter assisted the elevator. I suppose that is conceivably possible, but I doubt that's what you mean.
The reduced clause needs to be next to its antecedent.
Off the top of my head, I can't think of a way to rewrite your sentence with a reduced relative clause. But if you change it a little, something like 'The porter assisting the old woman walked slowly with her to the elevator' would be possible.
Or you could put a past participle clause (which has a passive meaning) first: 'Assisted by the porter, the old woman walked slowly to the elevator'. But that's not a reduced relative clause.
Hope this helps.
All the best,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
Aha, i see. Thanks alot
Hello
1.Checked the money , she went
shopping.
2.Checking the money , she went shopping.
Could you please tell me which one is correct?
Hello nekhpk,
1 is not grammatically correct. 2 is correct, but please note almost no one would ever say it in most situations -- this sounds like a fairly common situation, but a participle clause such as this one is quite formal.
All the best,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team