Look at these examples to see how used to, would and the past simple are used.
They used to live in London.
I didn't use to like olives.
We would always go to the seaside for our holidays.
But one holiday we went to the mountains instead.
Try this exercise to test your grammar.
- Grammar test 1
Grammar explanation
When we talk about things in the past that are not true any more, we can do it in different ways.
Used to + infinitive
We can use used to to talk about past states that are not true any more.
We used to live in New York when I was a kid.
There didn't use to be a supermarket there. When did it open?
Did you use to have a garden?
We can also use used to to talk about past habits (repeated past actions) that don't happen any more.
I used to go swimming every Thursday when I was at school.
She used to smoke but she gave up a few years ago.
used to + infinitive should not be confused with be/get used to + -ing, which has a different meaning. The difference is covered here.
Would
We can use would to talk about repeated past actions that don't happen any more.
Every Saturday I would go on a long bike ride.
My dad would read me amazing stories every night at bedtime.
would for past habits is slightly more formal than used to. It is often used in stories. We don't normally use the negative or question form of would for past habits. Note that we can't usually use would to talk about past states.
Past simple
We can always use the past simple as an alternative to used to or would to talk about past states or habits. The main difference is that the past simple doesn't emphasise the repeated or continuous nature of the action or situation. Also, the past simple doesn't make it so clear that the thing is no longer true.
We went to the same beach every summer.
We used to go to the same beach every summer.
We would go to the same beach every summer.
If something happened only once, we must use the past simple.
I went to Egypt in 2014.
Do this exercise to test your grammar again.
- Grammar test 2
Hello again Kirk,
Yes. Thank you. I do understand that I've asked so many questions already. If you have some time and my frequent messages haven't put you off helping me, below is a link you can use to watch the video. I am grateful, and if I can contribute to something you do as an organization or help in a different way, please tell me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wR7EIg4LzEA
1:15 - You would find him in the boiler room. (Repeated action in the past)
2:10 - The shirt looks a little bit different of a color he would've wore in the ring. He wore one that was a little bit more blue. (Repeated action again + maybe some uncertainty. On the one hand if we replace 'would've' with 'used to' or 'would', it'll still sound natural, but on the other hand there might be some uncertainty, since Chum cannot know everything about Mick Foley's wrestling T-shirts.)
2:20 - Obviously, I think we all know this isn't the one Mankind would've wore because he had his own hair. (Repeated action, I would use 'would wear', the explanation is logical and clear, there's no uncertainty)
3:40 - Chum: Was this something they would've sold at like a wrestling event? (Supposition + habitual state/repeated action. Chum is a wrestling fan, and he presumes that this mask was sold at a wrestling event, as were some other wrestling memorabilia items he's seen before.)
Mick: They wouldn't have been sold at the events but as a Halloween costume. (Just repeats the same construction. I don't know why. 'These were not sold at the events..." sounds better. We can't use 'wouldn't' - it means a different thing, 'didn't use to be sold' - might be too cumbersome.)
4:20 - And I remember the one you would've wore was slightly a different color. Am I right? (Chum presumes that this is not the original T-shirt based on the knowledge he has, but he wants to be sure.)
Hi Tony_M,
I agree with what you say about 1:15. For the others, I think you understand the meaning of these forms correctly, but now that I see the full context I think I'd say they are speaking of hypothetical past situations, i.e. actions or situations that did not happen. But there is indeed an element of repeated or habitual actions at play in the statements as well given the context.
Hope this helps.
Best wishes,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
Thank you. Sorry for being annoying, just wanted to understand.
Sorry, how to express a past habit that still continue 'til now? Thanks a lot
Hello a man learning,
It might not work in all situations, but if you started doing Brazilian jiu-jitsu 10 years ago and are still doing it now, you could use the present perfect continuous: 'I've been doing Brazilian jiu-jitsu for 10 years'.
If you had something else in mind, please feel free to describe it to us.
Best wishes,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
Hi
In the exercise "Grammar test 2" :
1- In the question "During that time, I ___ to spend at least two hours in the gym every day."
I don't understand why "would like" is wrong since it's an action that was repeated every day.
2- In the question "I ___ three eggs with toast and fruit for breakfast." for me the two answers proposed are correct, it can be an action taken without repetition over time (only once) or it can be an action which is repeated at each "breakfast" in the past.
If I can add a suggestion, I think it would be good if you added, for example, a tooltip or something else in the exercises "not only on this course but all your courses" to explain why this answer is correct and not another like that "we use Used to because we are talking about past states....." or "we use Would because we are talking about past repeated actions....."
Also that we can use in such a sentence "Used to and Would" but not in this sentence because this because that.
THANKS.
Hello Ama1,
The verb in the first example you quote is like and this is a verb which describes an emotion rather than an action. Would can only be used for habiltial actions, not states or emotions, and so used to like is needed.
I think your second point is a good one. You can indeed use either have had or used to have in this sentence. The meaning is different: have had describes your breakfast in the very recent past, while used to have describes a habitual action in the past, as you say. Well spotted.
I'll pass on your tooltip suggestion. I'm not sure it will be possible for existing material but perhaps we can include it in future exercises.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
I want to ask if this sentence is simple past or not "The crow eats the snails, then it flapped its wings".
And if this tense is past then why we put the word "eats" instead of "ate"
Kindly explain it to me
Hello Ayaka amani,
Although it's hard to be completely certain without knowing the full context, this does not look like a consistent use of tenses. I can't think of why the tenses would change like this. Using all past forms is common in narratives, so ate... flapped is likely, though it is possible to use present forms in anecdotes and informal storytelling to add immediacy (eats... flaps).
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello, Sir!
I was wondering why"a" is correct:
I ........ wear glasses when I was at university.
a. didn't use to
b. wouldn't
c. both are correct
I think "c" is correct because "wear" is used with continuou aspect as in the sentence "She was wearing a red dress when I met her." So, "wear" is a dynamic verb and should be grammartically correct when used with "would" discribing"past habit".
Thank you for your time.