Look at these examples to see how we can create conditionals with inversion.
Should you have any questions, I will be happy to help.
Were they to sell their house today, they would make a huge profit on it.
I would've taken you out for lunch had I known you were in town.
Try this exercise to test your grammar.
- Grammar test 1
Read the explanation to learn more.
Grammar explanation
We use conditionals to describe the result of a condition. Often, we use if to introduce the condition (e.g. If you feel hot, …) and the main clause to give the result (... feel free to switch on the aircon).
Conditional sentences can also be created without if, using inversion. Inversion means reversing (inverting) the normal subject–verb word order in a sentence. This makes the sentence more formal.
Three types of conditionals can be formed using inversion: first, second and third conditionals.
First conditional
We use the first conditional to talk about future situations we believe are possible.
Marker pens are in the cupboard if you ever need one.
If a customer wishes to cancel their booking, they should notify us within seven days.
To invert first conditional sentences, we replace if with the auxiliary verb should and change the verb into the infinitive. This makes the situation seem a little less likely. It is often used to make a polite request or offer.
Marker pens are in the cupboard should you ever need one.
Should a customer wish to cancel their booking, they should notify us within seven days.
Second conditional
We use the second conditional to talk about situations that we consider unlikely or impossible in reality.
How would the environment be affected if everyone reduced their meat consumption?
If the Sun disappeared, Earth would no longer be able to support life.
To invert second conditional sentences, we replace if with were and change the verb form to to + infinitive.
How would the environment be affected were everyone to reduce their meat consumption?
Were the Sun to disappear, Earth would no longer be able to support life.
Note that if a second conditional sentence uses the verb be, we don't need the infinitive for the inverted version. We just replace the existing form of be with were, and invert the subject and verb.
If California were a country, it would be one of the world's largest economies.
Were California a country, it would be one of the world's largest economies.
Third conditional
The third conditional is used to imagine a change in a past situation and how things would have been different in the past as a result.
If we had lost that match, it would've been a disaster.
We would have fixed that problem by now if we'd known about it earlier.
To invert third conditional sentences, we remove if and invert the subject and the auxiliary verb had.
Had we lost that match, it would've been a disaster.
We would have fixed that problem by now had we known about it earlier.
Negative inverted conditionals
To make negative inverted conditionals, we put not after the subject.
Should you not consent to sharing this information, you may inform our company at any time. (= If you don't consent …)
Were I not good at maths, I'd find this homework very challenging. (= If I wasn't good at maths …)
Had I not been busy this morning, I would have attended the meeting. (= If I hadn't been busy …)
Do this exercise to test your grammar again.
- Grammar test 2
I am amazed by the mistakes he makes.
->What amazes me is the mistakes he makes.
shouldn't this be 'what amazed me is the mistakes he makes'? or is there another grammar structure I haven't heard about?
Hello 343463,
Both past and present tenses are possible. If you use the past (What amazed...) then you are talking about your feelings at the time (then/in the past). If you use the present (What amazes...) then you are saying that it still amazes you now - your feeling has not changed.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
I'd take a box of matches in case we .................................. to make fire.
-wanted -would want
Since the structure of type 2 conditional is past simple+ would+ infinitive so I think the answer is would want, but it is wanted. Why is it wanted but not would want?
Hello 343463,
The verb 'would' is already used in this sentence ('I'd take') and so the other verb should be in the past simple ('wanted').
Does that make sense? In this case, this sentence with 'in case' follows the same structure as a second conditional, but that isn't necessarily always the case. I'd recommend looking up 'in case' in the dictionary and studying the example sentences.
Best wishes,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
Hello,
I would ask you about inverted conditional and its pattern.
E.g. Were Tom to resign, who would replace him?
Being an inverted conditional, we can remove "if" and use the structure: were+subject+to infinitive
This structure is not easy to remember. Is the inverted conditional regularly used?
Thank you
Hi User_1,
Inverted conditionals are relatively formal in style, so their use is less common. "If" conditionals are generally more common, and are perfectly acceptable instead of using inverted conditionals.
I hope that answers your question.
Jonathan
LearnEnglish team
Hello Jonathan,
Thank you. Inverted conditionals are not easy to remember.
If the river floods, a lot of people will have to be evacuated.
Should the river FLOOD, a lot of people will have to be evacuated.
If he has the right qualifications, I am sure they will offer him the job.
Should he HAVE the right qualifications, I am sure they will offer him the job.
Why are the verbs above not 'floods' and 'has' when the subjects are singular? Please answer this I'm so confused.
Hi 343463,
It's because in the inverted form, the modal verb "should" is used. After "should", the next verb needs to be in the base infinitive form.
I hope that answers your question.
Jonathan
LearnEnglish team
"Note that if a second conditional sentence uses the verb be, we don't need the infinitive for the inverted version. We just replace the existing form of be with were, and invert the subject and verb.
I have a similar sentence:
"If you were less than delighted with our product, we will refund your money immediately.
WERE you less than delighted with our product, we will refund your money immediately."
This sentence doesn't use the "to be" infinitive. But in this sentence, it uses the verb be like the previous sentence:
"If you were late for a job interview, what would you do?
WERE you TO BE late for a job interview, what would you do?"
It also uses "to be" infinitive, which the previous sentence doesn't have. I don't understand why both sentences use "were" but the way both are rewritten in the inversion structure is different?