Look at these examples to see how used to, would and the past simple are used.
They used to live in London.
I didn't use to like olives.
We would always go to the seaside for our holidays.
But one holiday we went to the mountains instead.
Try this exercise to test your grammar.
- Grammar test 1
Grammar explanation
When we talk about things in the past that are not true any more, we can do it in different ways.
Used to + infinitive
We can use used to to talk about past states that are not true any more.
We used to live in New York when I was a kid.
There didn't use to be a supermarket there. When did it open?
Did you use to have a garden?
We can also use used to to talk about past habits (repeated past actions) that don't happen any more.
I used to go swimming every Thursday when I was at school.
She used to smoke but she gave up a few years ago.
used to + infinitive should not be confused with be/get used to + -ing, which has a different meaning. The difference is covered here.
Would
We can use would to talk about repeated past actions that don't happen any more.
Every Saturday I would go on a long bike ride.
My dad would read me amazing stories every night at bedtime.
would for past habits is slightly more formal than used to. It is often used in stories. We don't normally use the negative or question form of would for past habits. Note that we can't usually use would to talk about past states.
Past simple
We can always use the past simple as an alternative to used to or would to talk about past states or habits. The main difference is that the past simple doesn't emphasise the repeated or continuous nature of the action or situation. Also, the past simple doesn't make it so clear that the thing is no longer true.
We went to the same beach every summer.
We used to go to the same beach every summer.
We would go to the same beach every summer.
If something happened only once, we must use the past simple.
I went to Egypt in 2014.
Do this exercise to test your grammar again.
- Grammar test 2
Hello,
1. It is said that would in this case is not often used in negative form (with not). But in this web site from oxford, there is number 2 whose answer is still wouldn't (not didn't use to). https://elt.oup.com/student/solutions/upperint/grammar/grammar_02_012e?cc=vn&selLanguage=vi
May I ask the reason?
2. One more, Is possible when the adverbs such as always, usually, often (as above) ... go with used to. i.e:
I used to always go for a walk after school. Now I'm too busy to do so.
Thank you very much.
Hello It's Phoebe,
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello,
May I know the difference between 'used to' and 'would'. Do they both show repeated actions in the past?
We used to go to the same beach every summer.
We would go to the same beach every summer.
Are these sentences have the same meaning?
Hello Aung Qui,
Both structures describe repeated/typical past habits and behaviour which is no longer true. The difference is that 'used to' can describe both actions (things we do) and states (things we are, such as how we feel, who we are or what we think) whereas 'would' is only used for actions. For example:
As a student, in the summer I would work on a farm for some extra cash.
In your examples 'go' is an action so both forms are possible.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello again,
Could I ask this too?
She used to smoke but she gave up a few years ago.
She would smoke but she gave up a few years ago.
Are these two sentences correct?
Thank you for your marvellous work!
Hello again Aung Qui,
The sentence with used to is fine but the sentence with would needs a little addition.
Remember that we use would for typical and expected behaviour rather than something which simply was true and no longer is. This means activities we describe with would happen in a certain time frame or at certain moments. Your sentence needs a phrase providing this. For example:
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello,
Can anyone justify the correct choice in "But Dad ___ angry because he had done the same when he was a kid." in Grammar test 1? I would select "wouldn't get" (as a repeated (re)action) but "didn't use to get" is the correct answer.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Hello mexuper,
We don't really use the negative form of 'would' ('wouldn't') to talk about past habits, which is why that answer is marked as incorrect.
Best wishes,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team
Hello,
Pawn Stars: FAMOUS WRESTLER Mick Foley Verifies RARE Memorabilia (Season 18) | History
Part 1:
Chum: Was this something they would've sold at like a wrestling event?
Mick: They wouldn't have been sold at the events but as a Halloween costume.
Is it? -> Repeated action in the past + Chum is not sure about where those things were sold or whether they were sold at all.
Part 2:
Chum: And I remember the one you would've wore (worn is probably better) was slightly a different color; it was more of a blue, am I right?
Mick: Much more blue on there.
After everything Chum has been through, he can't be sure about anything 🤣. I reckon if we replace 'would've worn' with 'used to wear' or just 'would', the idea will be similar but not quite identical, since 'would have worn' does add some uncertainty in this case.
Does it make sense?
Thank you
Hello Tony_M,
I'd have to have seen this video to be completely be sure, but it looks to me as if both parts are statements about past habitual actions. I wouldn't say there's any sense of uncertainty, but I suppose that from a certain point of view one could argue that there is some uncertainty because the speakers weren't in that past situation or, if we were there, they weren't in every such situation or don't remember all the details.
So in general I don't think grammars would describe the use of 'would have' here as one that includes the idea of uncertainty, but if I understand your point of view, I don't think it's wrong to see a slight sense of uncertainty in the statements. Does that make sense?
Best wishes,
Kirk
LearnEnglish team