Present tense

Level: intermediate

There are two tenses in English: past and present.

The present tense is used to talk about the present and to talk about the future.

There are four present tense forms:

Present simple I work
Present continuous I am working
Present perfect I have worked
Present perfect continuous I have been working

We can use all these forms:

  • to talk about the present:

London is the capital of Britain.
He works at McDonald’s.
He is working at McDonald's.
He has worked there for three months now.
He has been working there for three months now.

  • to talk about the future:

The next train leaves this evening at 17.00.
I'll phone you when I get home.
He is meeting Peter in town this afternoon.
I'll come home as soon as I have finished work.
You will be tired out after you have been working all night.

Present tense 1
MultipleChoice_MTYyMzQ=
Present tense 2
GapFillTyping_MTYyMzU=

Level: advanced

We can use present forms to talk about the past:

  • when we are telling a story:

Well, it's a lovely day and I'm just walking down the street when I see this funny guy walking towards me. Obviously he's been drinking, because he's moving from side to side …

  • when we are summarising something we have read, heard or seen:

I love Ian Rankin's novels. He writes about this detective called Rebus. Rebus lives in Edinburgh and he's a brilliant detective, but he's always getting into trouble. In one book, he gets suspended and they tell him to stop working on this case. But he takes no notice …

Present tense 3
MultipleChoice_MTYyMzY=
Present tense 4
GapFillTyping_MTYyMzk=
Average
Average: 4 (227 votes)
Profile picture for user Peter M.

Submitted by Peter M. on Mon, 04/06/2018 - 07:08

In reply to by uchiha itache

Permalink

Hello uchiha itache,

It's difficult to be entirely sure without knowing the context in which the sentence is used, but the present continuous for repeated actions often suggests some kind of irritation (if we are talking about another person) or frustration (if we are talking about ourselves). For example:

She always doing that! [this behaviour annoys me]

 

I'm always doing that! [it frustrates me that I cannot stop making this mistake]

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

And if I say : We often meet a lot . We're always meeting in the supermarket The 1st sentence is planned and I get it But..is the second not planned or it annoys me or both ?

Hello uchiha itache,

The sentence We're always meeting in the supermarket describes something which happens frequently, not a future event, and so I don't think whether it is planned or not is relevant here. The sentence suggests that the speaker does not feel happy about constantly meeting in the supermarket for some reason, but that is all we can say from it.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by raj.kumar123 on Sun, 27/05/2018 - 02:17

Permalink
Hello! Could you please tell me the difference between "Thanks for acceding to our request for coming." and "Thanks a lot for having acceded to our request for coming."? Is the person for whom this sentence is meant, has already come? Could you please help me understand theses phrases in socio-cultural contexts?
Profile picture for user Peter M.

Submitted by Peter M. on Sun, 27/05/2018 - 06:52

In reply to by raj.kumar123

Permalink

Hello raj.kumar123,

These do not look like natural sentences in English to me. You could say Thanks for acceding to our request for a meeting, for example. It is a very formal way to say this, however, and agreeing to would be much more likely.

In general, the perfect form emphasises recent completion with a concrete result. It is possible to say, for example, Thanks for having done this. However, even in this case I would say that Thanks for doing this is a far more common choice

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user dipakrgandhi

Submitted by dipakrgandhi on Tue, 08/05/2018 - 06:11

Permalink
This is the headline : Temperature continue soaring high in Pune Should it not be ' temperature continues ... '

Hello dipakrgandhi,

I think there are two possibilities here: The temperature continues... or Temperatures continue...

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user dipakrgandhi

Submitted by dipakrgandhi on Tue, 08/05/2018 - 06:04

Permalink
I have read this headline in Business newspaper : Sachin Bansal readies plan sell his stake to Walmart & quit Flipkart Should it be ' readies plan to sell ... ' . Please clear the confusion.

Hello dipakrgandhi,

We often omit certain words in headlines but the 'to' part of the infinitive here would not be omitted, I think, and the sentence looks odd to me even as a headline. I would say that 'to sell' is really required here.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Jenkin on Fri, 30/03/2018 - 11:01

Permalink
Brando plays an ex-boxer standing up to corrupt bosses. --why this sentence it talk about the past

Hi Jenkin,

This sentence is about the classic film On the Waterfront, which starred Marlon Brando. Since this sentence is summarising the plot of the film, it uses the present tense.

If you didn't know that about the film, it was difficult to get the right answer here. The person who wrote this exercise thought that people would recognise Marlon Brando's name, I suppose, but not everyone is familiar with him.

Please let us know if you have any other questions.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user benleng

Submitted by benleng on Wed, 07/03/2018 - 14:32

Permalink
You did not account for many verb clusters of the English language, particularly those with the 'past tense' form of will (i.e., would). They are: would go, would be going, would have gone, would have been going. Can you therefore say that English has just 12 tenses?

Hello Ibe Ben,

It all depends on how you define the word 'tense'. When someone says English has only two tenses, they use a narrow definition of the word 'tense'. Most English teachers and students use a wider definition of the word, and in this sense, yes, usually we say there are 12.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by mas kuswondo on Sat, 17/02/2018 - 08:18

Permalink
hi, I want to introduce myself. my name is muhammad hari kuswondo. I am a new member here. nice to meet you. from now, I have no comment. but. next time if I have i do it
Profile picture for user Ali boroki

Submitted by Ali boroki on Sat, 03/02/2018 - 12:50

Permalink
Hello dears. I have a question ,in the part that we want to talk about the future,in second sentences why you said"He's meeting peter in twon this afternoon"why you used present continuous?? Why you didn't use"He will........ please make it clarify for me.. Thanks in advance.

Hello Ali boroki,

The present continuous is often used to speak about arranged future plans. This means that 'he' has already spoken with Peter and they have a plan to meet at two. There is a more detailed explanation of this on our talking about the future page.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SahilK on Tue, 23/01/2018 - 05:31

Permalink
Hello, Sir, I found an advertisement where it was written, "Book by 29 Jan for travel until 20 June." Why "for travel" ? Can't we write "to travel" or "for travelling" ? And if you find any mistake in the sentences typed above please let me know. Thank you in advance
Profile picture for user Kirk Moore

Submitted by Kirk Moore on Tue, 23/01/2018 - 07:01

In reply to by SahilK

Permalink

Hello SahilK,

The other forms are not incorrect, though sound a little odd since 'for travel' is a common form in the context of advertisements. Note that 'travel' is used as both a verb and noun.

I didn't see any mistakes in your sentence, but please be aware that we do not provide this kind of service.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SahilK on Sun, 21/01/2018 - 12:32

Permalink
Hello, Sir I have doubts in the following sentences: 1) "He prevented me to go there". Why is this sentence wrong? And why do we write it as "He prevented me from going there" and when can we know where to use "preposition + verb1" or "preposition + verb1 + ing", just like in the above sentences? 2) "Everyone knows Mr Gates". Why it's passive form written as "Mr Gates is known to everyone". Why not "Mr Gates is known by Everyone" ? 3) Are all these sentences right? i) I sent messages. ii) Messages are sent by me. iii) Messages have been sent by me.
Profile picture for user Kirk Moore

Submitted by Kirk Moore on Sun, 21/01/2018 - 13:57

In reply to by SahilK

Permalink

Hello SahilK,

1) As far as I know, there is no good reason for this -- I'm afraid it's just the way these words are used. There are many, many patterns like this in English, and you just have to learn them.

2) You could also use the form you wrote, though it's true that the first one is probably more common.

3) Yes, they are -- good work!

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SahilK on Wed, 17/01/2018 - 06:54

Permalink
Hello, Sir, I was watching a video where this guy said, "There is only three ways to start a speech". I mean shouldn't there be "are" in place of "is". Like " There are three ways...". Thank you in advance
Profile picture for user Peter M.

Submitted by Peter M. on Wed, 17/01/2018 - 10:20

In reply to by SahilK

Permalink

Hello SahilK,

The correct form here is 'are' and not 'is'. I can't comment on the video you watched, of course, but people often make little mistakes when speaking, even in their own native language.

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Felix W on Fri, 12/01/2018 - 18:47

Permalink
Hello, I have a question about this example sentence "I’ll come home as soon as I have finished work." What is the difference between this sentence and " I’ll come home as soon as I finish work." Are they both grammatically correct? Please let me know. Thank you, Felix
Profile picture for user Peter M.

Submitted by Peter M. on Sat, 13/01/2018 - 06:16

In reply to by Felix W

Permalink

Hello Felix,

In this context there is no difference. The present perfect emphasises that the earlier action is complete before the second action. Sometimes there is a potential difference in meaning. For example:

  1. I'll leave when I see Paul.
  2. I'll leave when I have seen Paul.

The first sentence could mean that I want to avoid Paul and will leave as soon as I spot him, or it could mean that I want to talk to Paul and will only leave once we have spoken. The second sentence means that I will leave after meeting Paul - I want to see (meet) him before I leave.

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by SahilK on Tue, 02/01/2018 - 13:47

Permalink
Hello, Sir I have got these sentences. "I learnt all the concepts and so did my friend" and "I did learn all the concepts and so did my friend". My question is whether first or second or both are right?
Profile picture for user Peter M.

Submitted by Peter M. on Wed, 03/01/2018 - 08:50

In reply to by SahilK

Permalink

Hello SahilK,

The first sentence is correct. We use 'so did' (or 'so does', 'so will' etc) to avoid repeating the verb in both halves:

I learnt all the concepts and so did my friend is much more elegant than I learnt all the concepts and my friend learnt all the concepts.

 

Best wishes,

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team