Level: beginner
We use will:
- to express beliefs about the present or future
- to talk about what people want to do or are willing to do
- to make promises, offers and requests.
would is the past tense form of will. Because it is a past tense, it is used:
- to talk about the past
- to talk about hypotheses (when we imagine something)
- for politeness.
Beliefs
We use will to express beliefs about the present or future:
John will be in his office. (present)
We'll be late. (future)
We will have to take the train. (future)
We use would as the past of will, to describe past beliefs about the future:
I thought we would be late, so we would have to take the train.
Willingness
We use will:
- to talk about what people want to do or are willing to do:
We'll see you tomorrow.
Perhaps Dad will lend me the car.
- to talk about typical behaviour, things that we often do (because we are willing to do them):
We always spend our holidays at our favourite hotel at the seaside. We'll get up early every morning and have a quick breakfast then we'll go across the road to the beach.
We use would as the past tense of will:
- to talk about what people wanted to do or were willing to do in the past:
We had a terrible night. The baby wouldn't go to sleep.
Dad wouldn't lend me the car, so we had to take the train.
- to talk about typical behaviour, things that we often did (because we were willing to do them) in the past:
When they were children they used to spend their holidays at their grandmother's at the seaside. They'd get up early every morning and have a quick breakfast. Then they'd run across the road to the beach.
Promises, offers and requests
We use I will or We will to make promises and offers:
I'll give you a lift home after the party.
We'll come and see you next week.
We use Will you … ? or Would you … ? to make requests:
Will you carry this for me, please?
Would you please be quiet?
- will and would 1
- will and would 2
- will and would 3
Level: intermediate
Hypotheses and conditionals
We use will in conditionals to say what we think will happen in the present or future:
I'll give her a call if I can find her number.
You won't get in unless you have a ticket.
We use would to make hypotheses:
- when we imagine a situation:
It would be very expensive to stay in a hotel.
I would give you a lift, but my wife has the car today.
- in conditionals:
I would give her a call if I could find her number.
If I had the money, I'd buy a new car.
You would lose weight if you took more exercise.
If he got a new job, he would probably make more money.
What if he lost his job? What would happen then?
We also use conditionals to give advice :
Dan will help you if you ask him.
Past tenses are more polite:
Dan would help you if you asked him.
- will and would: hypotheses and conditionals
See also: Verbs in time clauses and conditionals
Level: beginner
Expressions with would
We use:
- would you…, would you mind (not) -ing for requests:
Would you carry this for me, please?
Would you mind carrying this?
Would you mind not telling him until tomorrow?
- would you like ..., would you like to ... for offers and invitations:
Would you like another drink?
Would you like to come round tomorrow?
- I would like …, I'd like … (you)(to) ... to say what we want or what we want to do:
I'd like that one, please.
I'd like to go home now.
- I'd rather… (= I would rather) to say what we prefer:
I'd rather have the new one, not the old one.
I don't want another drink. I'd rather go home.
- I would think, I would imagine, I'd guess to give an opinion when we are not sure or when we want to be polite:
It's very difficult, I would imagine.
I would think that's the right answer.
- Expressions with would 1
- Expressions with would 2
HI Jonathan,
I had a doubt; do we always use the past tense when using 'would' as a conditional?
For example, I would never go alone on a trip with someone if I didn't like them.
Or
I would never go alone on a trip with someone if I don't like them.
Which one is grammatically correct?
Thanks!
Daxita
Hi Daxita,
The exact meaning of the second sentence is slightly less clear than the first one, but they are both grammatically correct. The first one (using didn't like in the past simple and would) shows that this whole situation is unlikely or purely imaginary, in the speaker's point of view.
In the second one, using don't like in the present simple shows that not liking the person is real or possible, in the speaker's view (i.e., the speaker thinks there is a reasonable possibility of not liking the person). Using would in the same sentence, however, suggests an imaginary situation, so overall it's not clear how (un)real or (un)likely the speaker considers the whole situation, including both cause and result. This may not be important, however - it depends on the context and reason for saying this this. For example, perhaps the speaker simply wants to tell someone that it's really important to like one's travel partner. In this case, both sentences express the idea well.
I hope that helps!
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi all,
I'm wondering if someone can give a hand with this, I have a doubt about uses of would in questions. It is possible to use would with all of the pronouns?
Ex:
Would (I, you, he, she, it, we, they) use the car?
Or "would" can only use with some of them.
Thanks.
Hello Faber,
You can use 'would' with any pronoun.
The only modal verb which has a limited pronoun range is 'shall', which tends to be used with first person singular and plural ('I' and 'we').
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
"how would you describe yourself/your personality?"
Can I ask what is the purpose of "would" here?
Hello thanhngan712,
'Would' is used here to make the question less direct and more tactful or polite. You can imagine an implied if-clause: If I were to ask you, how would you....?
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi team, I have a question about the meaning of "would" in this sentence, please help me and thank you very much
What is the problem?
Alex read my journal.
I did not! Why WOULD I even want to read your stupid journal?
Because it contains the details of a life, and you don't have one!
Hi Hannie Vu,
It's from Modern Family, right? It's a funny show :)
Using "would" shows that this (i.e., wanting to read the journal) is NOT the real present situation. (The real present situation is that she does not want to read the journal.) So, wanting to reading the journal is a hypothetical situation - i.e., something that is not reality, and is only something imaginary.
You can see more examples of this meaning in the 'Hypotheses and conditionals' section on the page above.
I hope that helps.
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello. I had a question about whether (will) indicates future prediction and something you would like to do or typical behaviour and habit in this sentence: I will have a shower and then eat breakfast.
Hi Vanya,
I think all of those meanings are possible (although prediction is perhaps less likely, since predictions are typically about other people and things, not one's own actions).
It's not clear from this sentence alone which meaning is intended, so we would need to work that out by using other information from the context in which this sentence was said or written. :)
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello, Jonathan. How does "would" work in this sentence?
I look at a headline from the Sun newspaper. The headline says "Ralf will adapt style for Ronaldo". "But knee injury fears for opener". Then the writer goes on to say:
"Ronaldo is a big doubt for Ralf Rangnick's debut in the Manchester United dugout as he nurses a knee injury. It would be a major blow for the new boss who vowed to adapt his tactics to get the best out of the talisman."
Hello Selet,
If I've understood correctly, what this article says is that 1) Rangnick is counting on Ronaldo playing in Man United's first game with Rangnick as manager and 2) Ronaldo might not play in this game because he has a knee injury that doesn't allow him to play.
We don't yet know if Ronaldo can play in this game because his condition may improve, or it may not.
Therefore Ronaldo not playing in the game is speculation; at this point we can only imagine what it will be like. This is a hypothetical situation; 'would' reflects this.
Hope that helps you make sense of it.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi, WHAT TENSE IS THIS?
and can we use would it the future perfect at all?
EX. Don't think about this in the long run, would have found a new job by then!
Hello Dean,
The 'would have' + past participle form is often called conditional perfect, though not everyone (including the author of this page) really agree with this name.
It's typically used to talk about a hypothetical or imaginary action -- typically one that would have occurred if the past had been different. It's often used in third conditional constructions, which you can read more about on our Conditionals 2 page (https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/grammar/intermediate-to-upper-i…).
I'm afraid that the sentence you ask about doesn't make much sense to me, but I suppose that 'will have' seems better than 'would have' since it appears to talk about a future time rather than an imaginary one.
Hope this helps.
Best wishes,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
What is the difference between I guess and I would guess? For instance.
My guess is that she is Japanese, not Chinsese.
My guess would be that she is Japanese, not Chinese.
Hi Plokonyo,
Using 'would' makes the guess more tentative. A speaker might say this if:
- they have little confidence that their guess is correct.
- they want to avoid committing themselves to a particular guess. Using "would" implies that it is possible to change one's mind in the future about the guess.
- they are reluctant to make a guess in the first place (i.e. "If you asked me, my guess would be ..." - an unreal, hypothetical present). For example, in some situations it may be socially inappropriate to try to guess somebody's nationality.
In comparison, the first sentence states the speaker's guess in a relatively simple and factual way. It suggests more confidence and commitment to that guess.
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Thanks a lot, Jonathan. You say "would" makes the guess more tentative. Could you tell me what is meant by "tentative?" Also, what is the meaning of "hypothetical" in the use of would?
Q: What does "scorcher" mean in footbal
A: Scorch means to burn and in football a scorcher refers to a really hard shot. A scorcher is a really well-struck shot that travels very fast and powerfully into the net. Another word for this would be thunderbolt.
Here speaker A uses "would", why choose to use "would" rather than "is"?
Hi Plokonyo,
‘Tentative’ means something is not certain, or the speaker is not confident that it will actually happen. For example, if I plan to have a meeting at 10:00 but it’s not confirmed yet, then it’s a tentative plan.
‘Hypothetical’ means something is imagined in our mind, but is not necessarily true or real. It may be not true or not real because it is conditional on something else, unlikely to happen or even impossible, or an imagined alternative version of something that actually did happen.
About your second question, we’ve had several similar questions recently. Can I refer you to some of the good answers on this page below? The comment thread started by Jembut on 21/10/2021, in particular, might help - try to find that one below.
And let us know if you have any questions about it :)
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Thanks for the explanation, Jonathan. Yes, I'm beginning to understand now. What about the the following sentence? Here is an explanation about the phrase "I mean". How does "would" work here?
The phrase "I mean...", so "I mean" as a common English phrase that we use at the beginning of sentences to empahsize what we want to say or just used to give us more time to think about what we want to say. So in this case, it would be a filler word.
Hi Plokonyo,
This is a hypothetical situation, i.e., what the word would mean if somebody used it as a filler in a sentence. It's not about any particular sentence that somebody actually said, so it is an imagined usage rather than a real usage.
By the way, I noticed that some of the examples you ask about seem to come from English learning materials. If I may suggest, it might be a good idea to ask questions to the writers/teachers themselves, if you have a chance, as they will know best what meaning they intended. Here, we can try our best to explain what they mean, but it might be better to hear from the writer of this sentence him/herself.
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Why do we use "would" here? And what does it mean?
In English, there are different ways to express "very cold": one would be "freezing", another would be "icy"... there are many other possibilities.
Hello Plokonyo,
We often use 'would' to describe different options to choose from. You could use the present simple here as well.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Thanks, Peter M. I'm confused. As you have said. Either "is" or "would" can be used to describe different options. I don't know which I should choose in a sentence. Could you explain more clearly?
Hello again Plokonyo,
In this context, 'is' describes a fact about the world; 'would' describes an option you could choose if you wished. Both are perfectly fine here; it's really a question of preference for the speaker/writer.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Q: Which preposition should be used in "at" or "in" school?
A: Either "at" or "in" would be correct.
Here the second speaker uses would. What does it mean?
Hello Plokonyo,
'would' shows that the second speaker is thinking about a hypothetical situation. When we're not speaking about a specific situation -- in this case, for example, a specific situation would be a paragraph where a person says 'in school' or 'at school' -- we often use 'would' to show that we're speaking in general.
I can't say for sure that's what the second speaker intended here, but I think it's probably for this reason. It's quite a common situation.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Thanks for the asnwer Kirk. But I don't see at all where the hypotehtical idea is. I'm kind of confused. By the way, you also use "would" in a specific situation would be a paragraph where a person says "in school" or "at school".Could you tell me what the meaning of would in your sentence is?
Hello again Plokonyo,
That's well-spotted but it's still correct to use 'would' in that situation because it's a situation that I'm imagining. Each speaker decides whether a situation is hypothetical or imaginary or not in the way the imagine it.
I hope this helps.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Then what is an idea of the hypothetical "if" behind this use of would in your sentence?
Hello Plokonyo,
If I understand you correctly, the sentence you're asking me about is "In this case, for example, a specific situation would be a paragraph where a person says 'in school' or 'at school'."
In that sentence, I'm thinking about a situation (a classroom where a teacher answers a grammar question) that is imaginary. (By the way, I could also say that is it hypothetical. In this case, 'hypothetical' and 'imaginary' have the same meaning as far as I'm concerned.) There's no need for an 'if' or some kind of condition to be present for a situation to be hypothetical or imaginary.
By thinking of that situation as imaginary, I'm not suggesting it can't exist or doesn't exist. My language reflects my own idea that the situation I'm thinking about is imaginary/hypothetical.
Does that make sense?
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Does "would" mean "could be" in this sentence?
To register a shot on target means to have a shot on target. In this example, United have not troubled the keeper - they have not had any shots on target. Another way of saying 'on target' would be 'on goal' - the team did not register a shot on goal.
Hi Crokong,
The speaker uses 'would' because this is a hypothetical situation. In this example, the speaker said 'on target'. The speaker did not actually say 'on goal' in this example, so we are imagining a version of the sentence that is different from the example. That's why it's hypothetical.
It is possible to say 'could be' instead of 'would be' here. That makes the sentence sound more like a suggestion.
It's also possible to say 'is' instead of 'would be'. That presents it more as a factual statement of what the words mean (rather than imagining an alternative version of the original example).
It's important to realise that all these meanings are possible and grammatically correct. It just depends what the speaker wants to say - a hypothetical alternative example, a suggestion, or a factual statement. I hope that helps :)
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Thanks a lot for the explanation, Jonathan.By the way, is It OK to use a second conditional to talk about a current situation? The game is underway and the commentator says something like this.
It would be staggering if this game finished goalless. Or
I would be surprised if this game finished goalless.
My interpretation is:
It will not be staggering, so this game doesn't finish goalless.
I will not be surprised, so this game doesn't finish goalless.
Thsese don't make lots of sense, or maybe I misunderstand this conditional. I'm really confused. Please help me
Hi Crokong,
Yes! We can use a second conditional to describe an unreal present or future. For example:
-- I wouldn't worry if I were you. (unreal present - I'm telling you not to worry now)
-- If I won a lot of money, I'd buy a big house in the country. (unreal future - I'm imagining this future purchase)
Actually, I think your first two examples are unreal futures (not unreal presents) because they are about the finish of the game. Presumably, the game is still going on when somebody says this, so they are talking about an imagined future event (the end of the game).
I think your interpretations are generally right, but I think the cause and effect should be the other way round. For example, I expect that the game will not finish goalless (= cause), SO it will not be staggering for me / I won't be surprised (= effect).
This page has more explanation and examples: https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/grammar/intermediate-to-upper-i…
I hope that helps :)
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Thanks, Jonathan. My English grqmmar book says something like this.
In UK English, if you are angry with a child, you would say that you are cross.
UK I'm cross with you for not telling me where you were going.
Is this sentence right? Shouldn't it be "if you were angry with a child, you would say..."? But I often see such a construction. where the if-clause is present, the main clause past. Or maybe "would" has other uses here?
Hi Crokong,
This is the 'conditional' usage of 'would'. You're right - people do sometimes make sentences like this, even though these sentences apparently do not follow the rules. In this case, it is unclear whether the speaker views this as a likely or an unlikely situation.
Is the sentence right? It depends. From a traditional point of view, it's an incorrect mix of different conditional structures. But from a 'real usage' point of view, people do say sentences like these, and it's clear enough that one action is conditional on the other one (even if the likeliness of it is less clear). So, it can be seen as acceptable too.
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Thanks, Jonathan. If I don't know for sure, I'm just guessing. Do you use "would"?
A: What is the English translation of the French "trottoir"?
B: In UK, English it would be pavement, but it American English it would be sidewalk.
Hi Crokong,
It's possible, but 'could' or 'might' are more typically used for a guess (i.e., the speaker is not 100% sure that this is correct).
Here, the speaker is sure about the translation, but probably uses 'would' because he/she imagines a situation when somebody uses that word ('If you wanted to say that in UK English, it would be pavement'). It's slightly different from saying 'trottoir' means or is 'pavement' in UK English (present simple), which simply states the meaning of the word as a fact, without any imagined situation of use.
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Thank you so much for the explanation, Jonatan
Jurgen Klopp says it would be 'a crime' to rest Mohamed Salah for visit of 'tricky' Brighton |
Why is "would" used in this sentence? Is the speaker is less certain?
Hello Crokong,
We've provided a lot of similar explanations as to the use of 'would' so I think you can answer your own question here. What do you think?
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
The speaker is less certain, I think Will denotes a certainty.
Which one should I say in the following sentence?
My answer to your question is that...
My answer to your question would be that...
Hello Crokong,
Both forms are possible and commonly used. The form with 'would' is a little more tentative and, perhaps, polite; the form with 'is' is more direct.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Sir, I don't really understand what you mean by "tentative". "Is" (more direct) sounds not polite, dorsn't it?
How does "would" work in this sentence?
"I'm going to ___ bank/park/etc" needs an article, either a definite article "the" or an indefinite article "a or an" before the words for your destination. Saying "I'm going to bank" or "...to park" or "...to zoo", etc., <strong>would</strong> not be a good idea; such sentences don't mean anything.
If I say without "would", is it still correct and fits the situation?
Saying "I'm going to bank" or "...to park" or "...to zoo", etc., is not a good idea; such sentences don't mean anything.
Hello Jembut,
Yes, you can say 'Saying "I'm going to bank" is not a good idea' instead of 'Saying "I'm going to bank" would not be a good idea' but they are more or less appropriate depending on the situation. The first one is good as a general rule, whereas the second one is talking about an imaginary situation.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Kirk. Thanks. I said this sentence to a native speaker "I want to write you this evening", then he replies 'it should be "write to you". In British English, it would be wrong to omit "to". My question: why is "would" used in "it would be wrong to omit "to"?" I believe it's also correct to say "it's". It's difficult for me to decide as to whether I should 'is' or 'would' in some situation.
In British English, it would be wrong to omit "a".
In British English, it's wrong to omit "to".
Hello Jembut,
In the situation you describe, I also prefer 'it's wrong' to 'it would be wrong', but it's OK to use 'would'.
By using 'would', the person you spoke might be trying to be polite. In British English, speaking about a hypothetical situation (even if we are really speaking about a current situation) is one way we make a sentence more polite.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
In the sentence "it would be...",, why is "would" used in this sentence? Is it OK if "would" be substituted with "is?" It is....
Question A: I've tied the knot for 42 years. It's incredible. The time pass so quickly. Is this sentence right?
Answer B: The expression "tie the knot" means to get married - the ceremony itself, so in your sentence it would be I/we tied the knot 42 years ago