Look at these examples to see how we use these structures.
What he loves about hiking is that it doesn't feel like exercise.
Not only did she sing at the talent show, she also danced!
I know it may surprise you, but I really do know quite a bit about this.
Try this exercise to test your grammar.
- Grammar test 1
Read the explanation to learn more.
Grammar explanation
We can use different grammatical structures to add emphasis, either to a whole sentence or to highlight one particular part of it.
Cleft sentences
Cleft sentences allow us to emphasise different parts of the sentence, depending on which part is the most important. Cleft sentences are usually introduced by it or by a clause beginning with what.
Cleft sentences beginning with it
Here is a simple sentence with no particular emphasis.
You invited me to the party yesterday.
We can emphasise different elements of this sentence by 'fronting' them, that is, moving them to the front of the sentence after it + be.
It was you who invited me to the party yesterday.
Emphasis: you (not another person)It was yesterday that you invited me to the party.
Emphasis: yesterday (not another time)It was the party that you invited me to yesterday.
Emphasis: the party (not another event)
Cleft sentences beginning with what
What clauses + be are common in spoken English. They emphasise the part of the sentence that is outside the what clause.
What I like best about going to the cinema is talking about the film afterwards.
What drives me up the wall is people talking during the film.
What I found was that the films my friends liked were very different from the ones I liked.
This kind of cleft sentence can also begin with where, why, who, how, etc.
How the kids did this is still unclear to me.
We can also put the what clause at the end of the sentence.
The game we played was what I liked the most.
Inversion with negative adverbials
We can also use inversion to add emphasis. It has a more formal, persuasive and impressive effect.
To invert a sentence, we put the adverbial (e.g. never, rarely, not only, etc.) at the beginning and change the normal position of the subject and the auxiliary verb.
Rarely have I read such an original story.
(I have rarely read such an original story.)
If there is no auxiliary verb, we need to add one.
Not only do they have live reptiles but you can also touch them.
(They not only have live reptiles but you can also touch them.)
Little, no sooner and not
Some other negative words and expressions used like this are little, no sooner, never and not.
Little did I realise that the restaurant was about to close.
(I didn't realise that the restaurant was about to close.)No sooner had we got inside than the concert ended!
Not a single positive comment did I hear from Will.
Emphatic auxiliaries
In spoken English, we often stress the auxiliary verb to add emphasis.
A: Why aren't you coming to my birthday party?
B: I am coming! Who told you I'm not?!
If there is no auxiliary verb, we can use do, does or did to add emphasis. This works in both spoken and written English.
A: I know you weren't keen on the exhibition.
B: I did like some of it. (You thought I didn't like it.)A: Maybe that's why she was so happy.
B: That does make sense, actually. (I hadn't understood why before.)
In British English, do can also be used this way to make a command more emphatic. This sounds quite formal.
Do sit down, please.
Do be quiet!
Do this exercise to test your grammar again.
- Grammar test 2
Hello, teachers
I found a sentence in one passage "Even more striking was the fact that the collision between the robot Land Rover and the Tahoe was the only scrape in the entire competition."
Is the sentence using an inversion form? If so, why is it? Or are there any other rules to use inversion?
Thank you very much
Hello Risa warysha,
Yes, there is inversion in this sentence. The non-inverted word order would be something like this:
The fact that the collision between the robot Land Rover and the Tahoe was the only scrape in the entire competition was even more striking.
This is an example of inversion using an adjective to begin the sentence. It's an unusual form which we most often use when the adjective describes our reaction and we use a comparative or superlative form, or else use 'so... that':
There are many forms of inversion. I can put a few below for you.
=============
After negative adverbial expressions, especially those containing ‘no’
Under no circumstances can we accept credit cards.
In no way can he be held responsible.
At no time did she say she would come.
At no point was the price mentioned.
Not until I heard my name did I believe I had won the race.
After adverbial expressions of place
Round the corner came the postman.
On the doorstep was a bunch of flowers.
After 'seldom', 'rarely', 'never', and 'little'
Seldom have I seen such a beautiful view.
Never had I felt so happy.
Little did he imagine how dangerous it would be.
After 'hardly', 'scarcely', 'barely', 'no sooner', when one thing happens after another
Hardly had I begun to speak when I was interrupted.
Scarcely had we started our meal when the phone rang.
No sooner had I arrived than they all started to argue.
NB: hardly, scarcely and barely are followed by when; no sooner is followed by than.
After adverbial expressions beginning with 'only' and 'not only’
Only after the meeting did I realise the importance of the subject.
Only when the plane landed safely did he calm down.
Not only was the car slow, it was also very uncomfortable.
In past conditional sentences we can sometimes replace the 'if' with an inversion
Had you not invited him he would not be here.
Had I known it would be so difficult I would never have enrolled.
In expressions with 'here' and ‘there' as adverbs of place
Here comes the bus.
There goes all our money!
With verbs of reporting such as 'say' or 'ask' in direct speech
"I love you,” said Harry.
"How far is it?" asked the passenger.
In expressions with ‘so (+adjective)’ or ‘such (+be+noun)’
So terrifying was it that I had to stop watching.
Such was the dream that I had.
=============
I hope that's helpful.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello team!
I have a question:
It was yesterday that you invited me to the party. Why didn't use (when) instead of (that)?
Hello AboodKh9,
You could use 'when' here and it would not change the meaning. This is an example of what are sometimes called cleft sentences. These are grammatical constructions which serve to add rhetorical emphasis to certain parts of the sentence. For example:
You can read more about these constructions here:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/cleft-sentences-it-was-in-june-we-got-married
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Dear team,
Would you mind explaining the structure of the 7th sentence in Test 2? Why is the correct answer 'is' and not 'is to' or 'is (calling)'?
If there are any mistakes in my question, please help me correct them. Thank you for your time.
Best Regards,
Isabella
Hello Isabella,
The full sentence is:
The reason we use 'call' here is because we have the verb 'do'. If you change this verb, you'll change the form which follows. For example, compare these sentences:
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi. I still was a little confused. I still think the right answer is "calling" or "to call", no matter there is a "do" or not in the sentence, as "what you should do first" is the subject of the complex sentence, "is" is the link verb， so there should be infinitive verb or gerund followed "is". Or it is the fixed expression in English. Hope to receive your explanation. Thank you so much.
Hi lucky1358,
It's not a fixed expression but a particular type of construction (a cleft sentence), specifically a wh-cleft, and it has its own formation rules. You can read more and see more examples on this page:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/cleft-sentences-it-was-in-june-we-got-married
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Thank you. Can I understand in this way? "What you should do is call your mother." - This form suggests a straightforward and immediate action. It's a direct and clear instruction.
"What you should do is calling your mother." - This form, with "is calling," is less common and can imply a continuous or ongoing action. It might suggest that calling your mother is something you should do regularly or as part of a routine.
"What you should do is to call your mother." - This form, with "is to call," can be seen as slightly more formal. It emphasizes the idea of an obligation or duty to call your mother.
One more question. "What you should do is call your mother?" This expression is formal or informal?
Thank you so much.
Hello again lucky1358,
I think you're looking for patterns which are not there. We don't use the -ing form in this construction. The verb form (here: call) mirrors the verb form in the introductory phrase (here: do). You can only use the -ing form if you have an -ing form earlier:
I wouldn't say the expression/construction has any particular style or register. It is quite neutral and can be used in a wide range of contexts.
I hope that clarifies it for you.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team