Emphasis: cleft sentences, inversion and auxiliaries

Emphasis: cleft sentences, inversion and auxiliaries

Do you know how to add emphasis using cleft sentences, inversion or auxiliaries? Test what you know with interactive exercises and read the explanation to help you.

Look at these examples to see how we use these structures.

What he loves about hiking is that it doesn't feel like exercise.
Not only did she sing at the talent show, she also danced!
I know it may surprise you, but I really do know quite a bit about this.

Try this exercise to test your grammar.

Grammar test 1

Grammar C1: Emphasis: 1

Read the explanation to learn more.

Grammar explanation

We can use different grammatical structures to add emphasis, either to a whole sentence or to highlight one particular part of it.

Cleft sentences

Cleft sentences allow us to emphasise different parts of the sentence, depending on which part is the most important. Cleft sentences are usually introduced by it or by a clause beginning with what.

Cleft sentences beginning with it

Here is a simple sentence with no particular emphasis.

You invited me to the party yesterday.

We can emphasise different elements of this sentence by 'fronting' them, that is, moving them to the front of the sentence after it + be.

It was you who invited me to the party yesterday.
Emphasis: you (not another person)

It was yesterday that you invited me to the party.
Emphasis: yesterday (not another time)

It was the party that you invited me to yesterday.
Emphasis: the party (not another event)

Cleft sentences beginning with what

What clauses + be are common in spoken English. They emphasise the part of the sentence that is outside the what clause.

What I like best about going to the cinema is talking about the film afterwards.
What drives me up the wall is people talking during the film. 
What I found was that the films my friends liked were very different from the ones I liked.

This kind of cleft sentence can also begin with where, why, who, how, etc.

How the kids did this is still unclear to me. 

We can also put the what clause at the end of the sentence.

The game we played was what I liked the most.

Inversion with negative adverbials

We can also use inversion to add emphasis. It has a more formal, persuasive and impressive effect.

To invert a sentence, we put the adverbial (e.g. never, rarely, not only, etc.) at the beginning and change the normal position of the subject and the auxiliary verb.

Rarely have I read such an original story.
(I have rarely read such an original story.)

If there is no auxiliary verb, we need to add one.

Not only do they have live reptiles but you can also touch them.
(They not only have live reptiles but you can also touch them.)

Little, no sooner and not

Some other negative words and expressions used like this are little, no sooner, never and not.

Little did I realise that the restaurant was about to close. 
(I didn't realise that the restaurant was about to close.)

No sooner had we got inside than the concert ended!

Not a single positive comment did I hear from Will.

Emphatic auxiliaries

In spoken English, we often stress the auxiliary verb to add emphasis.

A: Why aren't you coming to my birthday party?
B: I am coming! Who told you I'm not?!

If there is no auxiliary verb, we can use do, does or did to add emphasis. This works in both spoken and written English.

A: I know you weren't keen on the exhibition.
B: I did like some of it. (You thought I didn't like it.)

A: Maybe that's why she was so happy.
B: That does make sense, actually. (I hadn't understood why before.)

In British English, do can also be used this way to make a command more emphatic. This sounds quite formal.

Do sit down, please.
Do be quiet!

Do this exercise to test your grammar again.

Grammar test 2

Grammar C1: Emphasis: 2

Language level

Average: 4.6 (50 votes)

Submitted by sowhat on Mon, 04/11/2024 - 19:50

Permalink

After reading ellipses, I also thought that we do emphasizing in formal writing what you listed under that topic by adding some words while we do emphasizing in informal writing and speaking by omitting unnecessary words to prevent the person from losing focus, and just to direct the person's attention into necessary words, core topic, that's in order to get to the point. Am I right?

Hello sowhat,

I think it's quite nuanced. On the one hand, formal writing uses more complex and elaborate structures and lexis, while informal writing has shorter sentences and simpler constructions. On the other hand, formal writing tends to be more focused on the message and to avoid extraneous comment, while informal writing often includes asides and filler phrases such as if you know what I mean or when you think about it. I think it's hard to generalise, to be honest.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by arina8509 on Mon, 23/09/2024 - 23:08

Permalink

Hello! Could you, please, help me to understand this example?

What we really need are more community colleges.

I found it in Scott Thornbury`s book about grammar and wonder why is it possible to use "are more..."

I thought that in cleft sentences it is possible to use only is/was 

 

Hello arina8509,

It's perfectly OK to use plural verbs in sentences like this. For example:

The person we really need is Bob.

The people we really need are Bob and Sue.

In your sentence 'what' is ambiguous in terms of being singular or plural, so both verbs are possible depending on how the speaker sees it.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by noman on Wed, 03/07/2024 - 10:13

Permalink

Hello teacher,
I have three questions to ask

  1. Which one is more formal?
    1. "It was yesterday, on which I finished my project." 
    2. "It was yesterday, when I finished my project."
    3. "It was yesterday, that I finished my project."
  2. Do we need to use comma in it for being more formal?
  3. Do we need to use, as a general rule, more formal sentence in writing and speaking in IELTS to score maximum bands.

Hello noman,

  1. Option 1 is not a natural sentence as 'on which' does not work with 'yesterday'. You could use the name of the day: It was Tuesday on which I finished...' I would say that this would be the most formal followed by the third option. The second sounds quite neutral. The sentences do not need commas, by the way.
  2. No.
  3. No. The language you use should be appropriate to the task being completed. If the task is writing a formal report then formal language is expected; if the task is a less formal one then less formal language is expected.

You can find a lot of information on the IELTS exam using the links below. You can also find practice materials, mock exams and sample answers for a lot of writing tasks.

https://ielts.org/take-a-test/preparation-resources 

https://ielts.org/take-a-test/preparation-resources/writing-test-resources 

https://www.cambridge.org/pl/cambridgeenglish/campaigns/ielts 

https://ielts.com.au/australia/about/ielts-for-teachers 

https://ielts.com.au/australia/prepare/ielts-test-preparation-material 

https://takeielts.britishcouncil.org/take-ielts 

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by ShetuYogme on Thu, 30/05/2024 - 10:42

Permalink

LearnEnglish team,

I have some questions about cleft sentences. Consider the following sentence: I don't think Spanish is important. What is important is (to) learn(ing) English. 
Which sentence is correct: 
1. What is important is to learn English. 
2. What is important is learn English. 
3. What is important is learning English.

 Now consider this: 
I didn't do anything wrong. What I did was ask a question. 
Can the second sentence be changed to "All I did was ask a question"?
Can I say "All that I did was ask a question", with "that" following "all", like in the sentence "All that glitters is not gold"? In what situation should I add "that" and when not?

Waiting for your insightful response. 
Thank you.

Hi ShetuYogme,

Sentences 1 and 3 are correct and they mean the same thing, though 3 gives a slightly stronger sense of the action (learning English) as a process, i.e., something that takes place over time.

In the second question, yes - you can use "All (that) I did".

The "that" is optional. "That" can be omitted in a defining relative clause when it is the object of the verb (here, it is the object of "did". Another example is He's the man that I spoke to yesterday - "that" is the object of "spoke to", and can be omitted). It's more common to say "All I did", without "that".

"Glitters" is connected to the subject "All", and it's also intransitive, so "that" cannot be omitted in "All that glitters".

Hope that helps.

Jonathan

LearnEnglish team

Submitted by davide.bellelli on Mon, 18/03/2024 - 08:09

Permalink

Question: Ex. 1, "No sooner HAD the tickets gone on sale than they sold out".

Would also WERE in this case be possible?