'will' and 'would'

Level: beginner

We use will:

  • to express beliefs about the present or future
  • to talk about what people want to do or are willing to do
  • to make promises, offers and requests.

would is the past tense form of will. Because it is a past tense, it is used:

  • to talk about the past
  • to talk about hypotheses (when we imagine something)
  • for politeness.

Beliefs

We use will to express beliefs about the present or future:

John will be in his office. (present)
We'll be late. (future)
We will have to take the train. (future)

We use would as the past of will, to describe past beliefs about the future:

I thought we would be late, so we would have to take the train.

Willingness

We use will:

  • to talk about what people want to do or are willing to do:

We'll see you tomorrow.
Perhaps Dad will lend me the car.

  • to talk about typical behaviour, things that we often do (because we are willing to do them):

We always spend our holidays at our favourite hotel at the seaside. We'll get up early every morning and have a quick breakfast then we'll go across the road to the beach.

We use would as the past tense of will:

  • to talk about what people wanted to do or were willing to do in the past:

We had a terrible night. The baby wouldn't go to sleep.
Dad wouldn't lend me the car, so we had to take the train.

  • to talk about typical behaviour, things that we often did (because we were willing to do them) in the past:

When they were children they used to spend their holidays at their grandmother's at the seaside. They'd get up early every morning and have a quick breakfast. Then they'd run across the road to the beach.

Promises, offers and requests

We use I will or We will to make promises and offers:

I'll give you a lift home after the party.
We'll come and see you next week.

We use Will you … ? or Would you … ? to make requests:

Will you carry this for me, please?
Would you please be quiet?

will and would 1

GapFillDragAndDrop_MTYzNzQ=

will and would 2

MultipleChoice_MTYzNzU=

will and would 3

GapFillTyping_MTYzOTk=

Level: intermediate

Hypotheses and conditionals

We use will in conditionals to say what we think will happen in the present or future:

I'll give her a call if I can find her number.
You won't get in unless you have a ticket.

We use would to make hypotheses:

  • when we imagine a situation:

It would be very expensive to stay in a hotel.
I would give you a lift, but my wife has the car today.

  • in conditionals:

I would give her a call if I could find her number.
If I had the money, I'd buy a new car.
You would lose weight if you took more exercise.
If he got a new job, he would probably make more money.
What if he lost his job? What would happen then?

We also use conditionals to give advice :

Dan will help you if you ask him.

Past tenses are more polite:

Dan would help you if you asked him.

will and would: hypotheses and conditionals

GapFillDragAndDrop_MTY0MDA=

See also: Verbs in time clauses and conditionals

Level: beginner

Expressions with would

We use:

  • would you…, would you mind (not) -ing for requests:

Would you carry this for me, please?
Would you mind carrying this?
Would you mind not telling him until tomorrow?

  • would you like ..., would you like to ...  for offers and invitations:

Would you like another drink?
Would you like to come round tomorrow?

  • I would like …, I'd like … (you)(to) ... to say what we want or what we want to do:

I'd like that one, please.
I'd like to go home now.

  • I'd rather… (= I would rather) to say what we prefer:

I'd rather have the new one, not the old one.
I don't want another drink. I'd rather go home.

  • I would thinkI would imagine, I'd guess to give an opinion when we are not sure or when we want to be polite:

It's very difficult, I would imagine.
I would think that's the right answer.

Expressions with would 1

GapFillDragAndDrop_MTY0MDE=

Expressions with would 2

GapFillTyping_MTY0MDI=

Average
Average: 4.3 (80 votes)

Submitted by Arsya on Tue, 11/02/2025 - 10:10

Permalink

What is the difference between will and would in the following?

Egypt wants to build a new city that will/would create new jobs.

Hello Arsya,

Will indicates that the speaker believes the city is likely to be created; would indicates that the speaker is skeptical as to whether or not the plan is realistic.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user Yornis

Submitted by Yornis on Sun, 09/02/2025 - 17:55

Permalink

Hello team,

I would be grateful if you could help me with the below,which is from an article explaining the use of "on" for boats.

The phrase "on the boat" can be used when we think about larger boats. A boat that transports large amounts of cargo or people at one time WOULD need the phrase, "on the boat." For example, if you ...................................................               Another example WOULD be, "My shipment still hasn't arrived and I think it's on the boat that's stuck in the middle of the Mediterranean."

 

What is the function of the two "would" in capital letters above?

My guess is the "would" in "WOULD need the phrase" is to express it as a hypothetical situation. Am I right?

As for the "would" in "Another example WOULD be" is to make instructions or opinions sound less forceful. Am I right?

By the way, in the article, for the phrase "on the boat" just before the words "For example", shouldn't the full stop be after the inverted commas of "on the boat"?

Thanks

 

 

Hello Yornis,

My guess is the "would" in "WOULD need the phrase" is to express it as a hypothetical situation. Am I right?

Yes, I agree. The author is imagining 'if there was a boat that... then it would need...'. It's a choice on the part of the author and the sentence could be phrased in different ways, including the present simple.

As for the "would" in "Another example WOULD be" is to make instructions or opinions sound less forceful. Am I right?

Again, other forms are possible here but I think 'would' here indicates politeness, as you say.

for the phrase "on the boat" just before the words "For example", shouldn't the full stop be after the inverted commas of "on the boat"?

This is a debated issue. Here's a good summary of the two schools of thought:

 

Finally, there remains the problem of whether to put other punctuation marks inside or outside the quotation marks. There are two schools of thought on this, which I shall call the logical view and the conventional view.

The logical view holds that the only punctuation marks which should be placed inside the quotation marks are those that form part of the quotation, while all others should be placed outside. The conventional view, in contrast, insists on placing most other punctuation marks inside a closing quote, regardless of whether they form part of the quotation. Here are two sentences punctuated according to the logical view:

"The only thing we have to fear", said Franklin Roosevelt, "is fear itself."
The Prime Minister condemned what he called "simple-minded solutions".

And here they are punctuated according to the conventional view:

"The only thing we have to fear," said Franklin Roosevelt, "is fear itself."
The Prime Minister condemned what he called "simple-minded solutions."

Note the placing of the comma after fear in the first example and of the final full stop in the second. These are not part of their quotations, and so the logical view places them outside the quote marks, while the conventional view places them inside, on the theory that a closing quote should always follow another punctuation mark.

https://www.sussex.ac.uk/informatics/punctuation/quotes/marks

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Thanks for giving an answer. Oh, sorry, one more short question if you do not mind:

Should exam candidates follow the logical or conventional view when it comes to punctuation?

Hello again Yornis,

Different examining bodies may have different guidelines but in general as long as you are consistent I don't think it matters.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by cokro on Tue, 28/01/2025 - 22:33

Permalink

What is the difference between I will say, I would say and I say in this dialogue?

Me: Is the phrase "give someone some lip" common in the US?

Example: He gave me some lip but I ignored it.

Jack: I say/will say/would say it's outdated.

Hello cokro,

To express an opinion in a context like this 'I would say...' is the most common option.

'I will say...' and 'I say...' are unlikely here but could be used in a longer discussion where various opinions are offered.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Hello cokro,

In this sentence, I would say, "I will say" form can be used:

I will say goodbye to my friends in the evening.

I think it helps.

 

Yogesh Thakur.

 

Hello again cokro,

'Will' can have the meaning 'be willing to' or 'accept the need to'. It can be used when the speaker wants to suggest that they won't say certain things but will say something else:

Do you think he's nasty?

I won't say he's nasty, but I will say that he's not always the nicest person around.

What's your opinion on this?

I don't want to say too much but I will say that it seems like a risky option.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user Yornis

Submitted by Yornis on Sat, 25/01/2025 - 14:41

Permalink

Hello team,

I would be grateful if you could help me with the below,

which is from an American detective series.

Enrico abducted a girl and the police are now trying to find him.

Detectives Stabler and Benson think Enrico's girlfriend, Helen ( a single mother ) knows where he is. So, they hold her in the interrogation room and try to force her to reveal where her boyfriend Enrico is.

Detective Stabler: Where WOULD he take her?

Helen: I don't know.

Detective Benson: Why should we believe you?

Helen: I WOULDN'T lie. My being here is putting my children at risk. Let me go home.

 

(1) My first question is: What is the function of "would" in Detective Stabler's sentence?

(2) My second question is: What is the function of "wouldn't" in

Helen's sentence.

Thanks.

Hello Yornis,

At this point I feel we are repeating the same explanations with different examples rather than explaining anything different. Perhaps you can look back at the many explanations we've given on this topic and try to answer your own question. We'll be happy to give feedback on your answer.

Remember that the detectives and their suspect have goals and are using language to elicit certain feelings and behaviour with those goals in mind.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

OK, I will try.

Let's start with no. 2 first, because I do not really have an answer for no. 1. 

For no. 2, my guess is that it is like my post about "It cannot be Tom. Tom wouldn't play drums at 3 a.m." Here, Helen is trying to give the impression that she telling a lie is not the reality. So she uses "wouldn't lie" to express it in hypothetical terms. Am I right?

As for no. 1, I have looked back over and over again at past answers and could not find anything similar. There is no hypothetical element here, because Enrico abducting the girl is a fact. So why did Detective Stabler use "would"?  I would appreciate it if you could explain.

Thanks

Hello Yornis,

The whole situation is hypothetical in the sense that the detectives are following a hunch. They do not have proof that Enrico took anyone but are following a hypothesis that they have come up with. If they had hard evidence of Enrico taking the victim then they might use will, but they do no and so would is appropriate.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Hello teacher,

First of all, thank you for answering. Your answer above is for no. 1( i.e  the reason for Detective Stabler using "would"). You did not mention anything about no. 2 ( i.e  my guess for Helen using "wouldn't"). Since you did not mention anything about no. 2,  I am assuming you agree with my reasoning there, right?  

Thank you

Hello Yornis,

My answer refers to the whole situation. There is no proof that Enrico took anyone so it is a hypothesis, not a fact. All participants are using would for this reason.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Plokonyo on Wed, 22/01/2025 - 22:29

Permalink

My question is about "would" and "will" in the following dialogue. I'm confused as to why speaker B doesn't use "will" instead. Why not "it will sound odd", we will normally say ...","it will be best to say?" Can you explain?

A: My birthday party is on Saturday, April 4th this week.

Can I insert "of" before "this week"?

B: It would sound odd. We would normally say 'Saturday of this week' without specifying the date. It would be best to say 'My birthday party is this week, on Saturday April 4th'

Hello Plokonyo,

As we have said before in a number of replies, will is used when the situation is likely or certain to happen and would is used when the person is speculating about something which is unlikely to happen or certain to not happen. Here, B is not actually going to use these words but is imagining what they would say if they did need to say this.

I think these will/would questions are rather going around in circles at this point with examples only eliciting the same responses from our team rather than adding anything new to the discussion.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Plokonyo on Thu, 16/01/2025 - 11:03

Permalink

Can you explain what the difference? Do I use "will" or "would" when asnwering a question from A?

A: Do you write "millennials' generation" or "millennials generation"?

B: I would / will write "millennials". If I was forced to add "generation", it would be "the millennial generation", just as I would write "the baby-boomer generation".

Hello Plokonyo,

'Would' is the best choice here. 'Will' suggests that you are really going to say this, so you might use 'will' if you are talking about a presentation you have to give in a few moments and are thinking about how to phrase something. Here, B is clearly speaking in hypothetical terms, so 'would' is appropriate.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Thanks, Peter M. What about the following?

Your helping me with my homework would be a good idea.

Can I use "will" as well?

Your helping me with my homework will be a good idea.

 

Hello again Plokonyo,

Yes, you can. I think 'will' suggests that this is a real situation - you are going to do the homework and the other person may help you. If you use 'would' is may be purely hypothetical (If I had homework, your helping me would be a good idea), but it may just be the use of 'would' as a politeness marker in the same way we use 'could' as a more polite option than 'can' in requests.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Hello Plokonyo,

I'm not sure what you mean here. 'Will' is a modal verb with various meanings and it can be used in some idiomatic expressions but it is not in itself idiomatic.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by Arsya on Wed, 08/01/2025 - 06:46

Permalink

I want to understand the use of "would" in this sentence. Can you explain how it works? If I use "will", what's the difference?

In the UK we would say the lift, not the elevator.

In the UK, we will say the lift, not the elevator.

Hello Arsya,

Would is very common in this type of statement. It can be thought of as a kind of hypothetical conditional in which the if-clause is omitted: If we needed to say this, we would say... 

In sentences like this the present simple is also possible: this is what we normally do in this situation as an alternative to this is what we would do if we were in this situation.

 

Will is similar in that it also describes expected or predictable behaviour, but it is more commonly used for concrete situations rather than general ones, and for situations which are real or which might happen rather than abstract or imaginary situations. For example, you might use will to predict what how a particular person might react in a given situation, or where a particular person might be at a particular moment. In your example I think would is much better for this reason

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Thanks a lot, Peter M. If so, what's the difference between the following sentences? The choice for using "will" and "would" is confusing me.

It will be very expensive to stay in a hotel.

It would be very expensive to stay in a hotel.

 

Hello Arsya,

In this case I think it is a question of whether the speaker is talking about something that is really happening/very likely (will) or is imaginary/hypothetical (would). For example, if the trip is certain to happen and the only question is one of accommodation, then the first example is most likely. If the trip is not certain to happen (perhaps because of the cost) then the second example is more likely.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Hello Arsya,

In the comments we try to provide answers to the questions our users have but it's not a place for us to teach lessons. We are a small team and we have many comments and questions every day so there is a limit to what we can do.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user Yornis

Submitted by Yornis on Thu, 02/01/2025 - 16:42

Permalink
Hello team, I would be grateful if you could help me with the below. At first glance the below question looks like my previous question about "playing drums". On closer look it is not the same because the below is based on a past action whereas the "play drums" question is based on sth currently happening. Besides that, the below has a "would + past participle" as a possible answer. Mr and Mrs A hold a buffer style feast for the whole neighbourhood. Rice will be served and every guests will have to bring their own plates. Half an hour after all the guests have gone home, Mr and Mrs A clear up the tables. Mr A: Look! One guest has forgotten to take home his plate. There is not a single rice left on the plate. This guest ate every rice. I wonder who's plate it is. Mrs A: It must be Joe's plate; (a) Joe WILL eat every rice of his meal. (b) Joe WOULD eat every rice of his meal. (c) Joe WOULD HAVE eaten every rice his meal. Are (a), (b) and (c) all correct? Thank you.

Hello Yornis,

We've answered many questions on this topic for you already so why don't you tell us what you think the answer is/answers are and we'll tell you if we agree?

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Okay, no problem.

(a) It must be Joe's plate. Joe WILL eat every rice of his meal.

Dictionaries say "will" indicates habit or typical behaviour. So, this must be correct for the above context. Do you agree?

(b) It must be Joe's plate. Joe WOULD eat every rice of his plate. 

Despite the fact that someone really did eat every rice earlier, the speaker has opted to use "would" here to express her statement as a hypothetical situation. I think this is allowed. So, (b) is also correct for the above context. Do you agree?

(c) It must be Joe's plate. Joe WOULD HAVE eaten every rice of his meal.

    Something is a bit off in (c). Although it seems gramatically correct , I just can't put my finger on where the problem lies. 

Could you tell me whether (c) is right or wrong for the above context?

Thanks.

 

 

Hello again Yornis,

(a) It must be Joe's plate. Joe WILL eat every rice of his meal.

Dictionaries say "will" indicates habit or typical behaviour. So, this must be correct for the above context. Do you agree?

Yes, I agree.

(b) It must be Joe's plate. Joe WOULD eat every rice of his plate.

Despite the fact that someone really did eat every rice earlier, the speaker has opted to use "would" here to express her statement as a hypothetical situation. I think this is allowed. So, (b) is also correct for the above context. Do you agree?

I think this is not form we would use. The speaker is talking about a real situation; a hypothetical situation would be the opposite: This can't be Joe's plate. Joe would eat every grain of rice...

(c) It must be Joe's plate. Joe WOULD HAVE eaten every rice of his meal.

   Something is a bit off in (c). Although it seems gramatically correct , I just can't put my finger on where the problem lies.

Could you tell me whether (c) is right or wrong for the above context?

Again, this requires a hypothetical situation rather than a real one: This can't be Joe's plate. Joe would have eaten every grain of rice...

 

The difference between b and c is that b uses Joe's typical behaviour as the basis of the deduction, while c speculates on what Joe would have done in a specific instance and uses that to draw a conclusion.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by ShetuYogme on Wed, 25/12/2024 - 16:14

Permalink

Hello LearnEnglish team,

The Longman Dictionary entry of would at the 11th point says that would is used to say that an action is typical and expected:

  • You would go and spoil it, wouldn't you!
  • She insists that she did nothing wrong, but then she would say that, wouldn't she?

But your explanation says

We use "will" to talk about typical behaviour, things that we often do (because we are willing to do them):
We always spend our holidays at our favourite hotel at the seaside. We'll get up early every morning and have a quick breakfast then we'll go across the road to the beach.

  1. Can I use "will" instead of "would" in these sentences, abiding by your explanation?
  2. "Wil" and "would"  are used for typical behaviour in the present—then what is the difference between using "will" and "would" for typical and expected actions?

Hello ShetuYogme,

If you look at the entry for 'will' in the same dictionary, you'll see the following entry:

4 what generally happens used to say what always happens in a particular situation or what is generally true

Oil will float on water.

Accidents will happen.

https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/will 

The main difference is that would in this case is generally used to show disapproval.

 

I think the broader point you need to keep in mind is that every language has multiple ways of expressing concepts, and that attempting to assign one form exclusively to one concept will always lead to these kinds of problems. Where there are multiple ways of expressing something the best way to familiarise yourself with the differences is to see a lot of examples by reading and listening as widely as possible. New Year is a good time to set yourself a goal, so if you have the time and possibility you could try to set aside a certain amount of time each day to read a couple of articles online in English on topics that interest you, and pay attention to any uses of will or would as you do so.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Hello Peter,

Yes, I can find a lot of articles online in English. The Indian English newspapers that I am familiar with have their respective websites available on the Internet. I can access the website of the BBC, which I think uses the most correct English as this is run by English people. Could you recommend some plateforms that I can find fascinating articles in, elevating my reading skills? 

What do you say about English used in Indian newpapers and online articles? I think they can't use the highly correct English as English is not their native language.

Thank you.

 

Hello ShetuYogme,

It really depends on what topics interest you. There are some very good media organisations in the UK:

https://www.theguardian.com/international

https://www.bbc.com/news

Tortoise media is an interesting slow news site set up by a former BBC news editor and a former editor of The Times:

https://www.tortoisemedia.com/

The Conversation is an interesting place for eclectic articles written by experts in their fields with help from journalists to make the articles more accessible:

https://theconversation.com/global

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user Yornis

Submitted by Yornis on Fri, 13/12/2024 - 11:35

Permalink

Hello team,

I am sorry for the long question above. Being quite new in this site, I did not know the proper things to do.

I have shortened my question to the below:

At  3 a.m, a couple are awakened by one of their neighbours

playing drums.

Wife:   Someone is playing drums. It must be Henry.

Husband:  No, it cannot be Henry;

                   (a) Henry WILL NOT play drums at 3 a.m

                    (b) Henry WOULD NOT play drums at 3 a.m 

Are both (a) & (b) correct?

Thank you

Hello Yornis,

Since the husband is sure it is not Henry he should use a hypothetical form to be consistent. Therefore would not is the most likely form here.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Hello teacher,

(1) I am sure it was a typo above; you meant to write "Since the HUSBAND is sure....", right?

(2) Regarding your answer, isn't being sure always associated with "will" as opposed to "would"? So, why is "WILL not" wrong above?

(3) And another question is: "consistent" with what?

Thank you

Hello again Yornis,

1) Yes, that's right. I've edited the comment to change 'wife' to 'husband'.

2) You can be sure that something is true or sure that something is not true. If the latter, then you treat the situation as hypothetical. For example, I am sure that the Earth is spherical and not flat. If it were flat, we would not see ships disappearing over the horizon.

3) The statements needs to be consistent internally and consistent with the husband's other statement(s).

 

I think we've given about as much explanation in this area as we can and we're now just repeating ourselves, so I think we'll consider this particular topic closed. I hope we've provided some clarification for you.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user Yornis

Submitted by Yornis on Wed, 11/12/2024 - 15:23

Permalink
I am writing the below again, because it seems the question I submitted a few minutes ago did not reach you. Hello team, I would be grateful if you could help me with the below. Tom, Mr & Mrs A, Mr Mrs B & live in three separate houses in the same neighbourhood. It is now 3 a.m and the neighbours are suddenly awaken by someone playing drums. (1) Mrs A to Mr A: (a) That will be Tom; (b) That would be Tom; (c) Tom plays drums at 3 a.m (d) Tom will play drums at 3 a.m (e) Tom would play drums at 3 a.m (2) This question is still based on the same situation as no.(1) above, but this time in the house of another neighbour. Mrs B: That will/would be Henry; Mr B: No, that cannot be Henry; (f) Henry does not play drums at 3 a.m (g) Henry will not play drums at 3 a.m (h) Henry would not play drums at 3 a.m Correct me if I am wrong, but I think (e) and (h) are both wrong, because you once said "would" is for habitual actions in the past. What do you tthink of the rest, that is (a), (b), (c), (d), (f) and (g) Thank you.

Hello Yornis,

I'm afraid we can't answer this kind of long and intricate question. Please remember that we are a small team here offering a free service for many thousands of users. We try hard to provide as much help as we can but this kind of question, asking for explanations of multiple alternatives, is more than we can manage in the time we have available. Please try to keep questions short and concrete and we will try to help with our answers.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user Yornis

Submitted by Yornis on Sun, 24/11/2024 - 16:50

Permalink

Hello team, 

I would be grateful if your could help me with the below.

"Yesterday morning, the government announced their decision not to go ahead with the project. Your friend WOULD HAVE BEEN pleased."

What's the difference if the speaker had said:

Your friend WOULD BE pleased.

Thank you.

Hello Yornis,

...would have been... is speculation about the past: the speaker is talking about the friend's feelings at the time of the decision.

...would be... is speculation about the present: the speaker is talking about the friend's feelings now.

 

Peter

The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user Yornis

Submitted by Yornis on Sat, 23/11/2024 - 16:03

Permalink

Hello team,

I would be grateful if you could help me with the below:

A teacher in an international school tells or reminds his class which consists of pupils of various races:

(1) Do not make statements that WILL hurt other races.

(2) Do not make statements that WOULD hurt other races.

Are both no.1 and no. 2 correct, or only one of those is correct?

Thank you.