1. Grammar
  2. B1-B2 grammar
  3. Conditionals: third and mixed

Conditionals: third and mixed

Conditionals: third and mixed

Do you know how to use third conditionals and mixed conditionals? Test what you know with interactive exercises and read the explanation to help you.

Look at these examples to see how third and mixed conditionals are used.

We would have walked to the top of the mountain if the weather hadn't been so bad.
If we'd moved to Scotland when I was a child, I would have a Scottish accent now.
If she was really my friend, she wouldn't have lied to me.

Try this exercise to test your grammar.

Grammar test 1

Conditionals 2: Grammar test 1

Read the explanation to learn more.

Grammar explanation

Do you know how to use third and mixed conditionals?

Third conditionals and mixed conditionals

Conditionals describe the result of a certain condition. The if clause tells you the condition (If I hadn't been ill) and the main clause tells you the result (I would have gone to the party). The order of the clauses does not change the meaning.

If I hadn't been ill, I would have gone to the party.
I would have gone to the party if I hadn't been ill.

Conditional sentences are often divided into different types.

Third conditional

The third conditional is used to imagine a different past. We imagine a change in a past situation and the different result of that change.

If I had understood the instructions properly, I would have passed the exam.
We wouldn't have got lost if my phone hadn't run out of battery.

In third conditional sentences, the structure is usually: If + past perfect >> would have + past participle.

Mixed conditionals

We can use mixed conditionals when we imagine a past change with a result in the present or a present change with a result in the past.

1. Past/Present 

Here's a sentence imagining how a change in a past situation would have a result in the present.

If I hadn't got the job in Tokyo, I wouldn't be with my current partner.

So the structure is: If + past perfect >> would + infinitive.

2. Present/Past

Here's a sentence imagining how a different situation in the present would mean that the past was different as well.

It's really important. If it wasn't, I wouldn't have called you on your holiday.

And the structure is: If + past simple >> would have + past participle.

Do this exercise to test your grammar again.

Grammar test 2

Conditionals 2: Grammar test 2

Try another grammar lesson
Average: 4.2 (136 votes)
Do you need to improve your English grammar?
Join thousands of learners from around the world who are improving their English grammar with our online courses.
Find out more

Hello ramy brava,

'Mixed conditionals' are simply conditional sentences which have two different time references: one for the if-clause and a different one for the result-clause.

You can read more about conditional sentences, and see some more examples, on this page:

https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/grammar/english-grammar-reference/verbs-in-time-clauses-and-if-clauses

Peter
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by jiyi on Thu, 06/12/2018 - 00:41

Permalink
thank you so much, teacher Kirk! That clears everything for me about these sentences :)

Submitted by jiyi on Wed, 05/12/2018 - 05:09

Permalink
Dear,teacher Kirk. I am sorry to bother you again. I forgot to ask the third sentence ( 'If I kissed the girl, I will have to apologize to her'). It isn't indicate a hypothetical situation, is it? I mean : does the sentence gives you impression that ' I did kiss the girl , or at least, I am convinced that I did kiss the girl in the past , and now I regret it and I realize I must then apologize to her' ? Thank you so much again.

Hello again jiyi,

This third sentence would not be correct in most situations. If the if-clause refers to a hypothetical situation, as it seems to do here, the other clause needs some kind of conditional verb (e.g. 'would'). For example, 'If I kissed the girl, I would have to apologise'.

If, however, the speaker is speaking about the past, for example, admitting that they possibly don't remember their actions, then this sentence could be grammatically correct. It would mean something like 'I don't think I kissed the girl, but if I did, I will have to apologise to her'.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by jiyi on Thu, 29/11/2018 - 04:20

Permalink
dear teacher, Thank you so much for replying. It was actually a post in this comment section from August 2016. btw, I am sorry, but I have to ask help again. I just want to clarify some : 1. Actually, I am already aware about the tricky part of ' have ' as you've mentioned. But I am having difficulty to understand where these sentences belong to. For instance, If I didn't want to make a third conditional with my first sentence ( If I had kissed her, I would have to..) is it structurally a mixed conditionals ( a combination of 3rd and 2nd conditional)? because from my point of view, the clauses in that sentence have different time period (one in the past and the other one is in the future) and I was also using 'have to' as a way to talk obligation instead of using it to make a perfect form, is it true? 2. And for the second sentence ( If I kissed.., I would have to..). If this is a correct sentence, then is the meaning of that sentence functioning like a 2nd conditional ('if I kissed..' as a present or future hypothetical situation-->meaning: if I ever kiss the girl someday, then i must apologize to her)? sorry for bothering you, I need such clarification because I found that this way is what works well for my studying. Thank you again.

Hi again jiyi,

Sentence 1 is indeed a mixed conditional (with third conditional in the first part and second conditional in the second part) and it is grammatical. 'had kissed' refers to an action that could have happened in the past (but did not) and 'would have to apologise' refers to an imaginary action in the present or future (that also isn't happening).

Sentence 2 is a second conditional construction, with a verb in the past simple ('kissed') in the 'if'-clause and 'would' + base form in the other clause. Your explanation correctly explains the idea of the sentence.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Submitted by jiyi on Wed, 28/11/2018 - 01:16

Permalink
Dear teachers, I,ve read a few of the comments here but I am having difficulty to understand some of the examples given: 1. 'If I had kissed the girl, I would have to apologize to her.' I had a debate with my friend last night because she thought that this is a 3rd conditional (because of the 'would have') , but I think that this is more like a mixed conditionals, am I right? 2. You said that: 'If I kissed the girl, I would have to apologize to her' is wrong, because it combines real and unreal situation. I don't really get it. Can you please explain this with more details(which one is real and unreal) ? I thought that this was true because it follows a 2nd conditional ( and I think the questioner was thinking about present hypothetical situation) ? But you gave another example instead: 'If I kissed the girl, I will have to apologize to her.' which obviously has different meaning( not hypothetical). Please help me to understand this. I am confuse. Thank you very much :)

Hi jiyi,

I'm afraid I can't find the examples you are speaking of on this page. In sentence 1, the second verb would need to be 'would have had' for it to be a full third conditional structure. Sentence 2 looks correct to me.

I think what might be confusing you is the form 'to have to', which indicates obligation. It can be confusing, because 'have' is also part of the 'would have + past participle' form that is used in the third conditional. If you changed the second part to just 'apologise' (instead of 'have to apologise'), then you'd get:

1st conditional: If I kiss her, I will apologise
2nd conditional: If I kissed her, I would apologise
3rd conditional: If I had kissed her, I would have apologised

I hope that clears it up for you.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team

Profile picture for user Ahmed Imam

Submitted by Ahmed Imam on Wed, 26/09/2018 - 21:36

Permalink
Could you please explain" wouldn't+ verb"? For example: I wouldn't leave the office until I had checked that all the doors were locked. My question is: shouldn´t we use "didn't leave" instead of "wouldn´t leave" or is it correct as it is. Thank you.

Hello Ahmed Imam,

What is correct here depends on the situation and what the speaker means. If this sentence is about a specific past action, then you are right, 'didn't leave' is the best form. 'would' can be used to speak about past habitual actions, however, so it is actually possible to use it here if that's what the speaker means.

All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team