Level: beginner
Possibility and impossibility
We use could to show that something is possible, but not certain:
They could come by car. (= Maybe they will come by car.)
They could be at home. (= Maybe they are at home.)
We use can to make general statements about what is possible:
It can be very cold here in winter. (= It is sometimes very cold here in winter.)
You can easily get lost in this town. (= People often get lost in this town.)
We use can't or cannot to say that something is impossible:
That can't be true.
You cannot be serious.
Level: intermediate
We use could have to make guesses about the past:
It's ten o'clock. They could have arrived by now.
Where are they? They could have got lost.
We use could to make general statements about the past:
It could be very cold there in winter. (= It was sometimes very cold there in winter.)
You could easily get lost in that town. (= People often got lost in that town.)
We use can't have or couldn't have to say that a past event was impossible:
They know the way here. They can't have got lost!
If Jones was at work until six, he couldn't have done the murder.
Ability
Level: beginner
We use can and can't to talk about someone's skill or general abilities:
She can speak several languages.
He can swim like a fish.
They can't dance very well.
We use can and can't to talk about the ability to do something at a specific time in the present or future:
I can see you.
Help! I can't breathe.
We use could and couldn't to talk about the past:
She could speak several languages.
They couldn't dance very well.
Level: intermediate
We use could have to say that someone had the ability or opportunity to do something, but did not do it:
She could have learned Swahili, but she didn't want to.
I could have danced all night. [but I didn't]
Permission
Level: beginner
We use can to ask for permission to do something:
Can I ask a question, please?
Can we go home now?
could is more formal and polite than can:
Could I ask a question please?
Could we go home now?
We use can to give permission:
You can go home now.
You can borrow my pen if you like.
We use can to say that someone has permission to do something:
We can go out whenever we want.
Students can travel for free.
We use can't to refuse permission or say that someone does not have permission:
You can't go home yet.
Students can't travel for free.
Requests
We use could you … as a polite way of telling or asking someone to do something:
Could you take a message, please?
Could I have my bill, please?
can is less polite:
Can you take a message, please?
Offers
We use can I … to make offers:
Can I help you?
Can I do that for you?
We sometimes say I can ... or I could ... to make an offer:
I can do that for you if you like.
I could give you a lift to the station.
Suggestions
We use could to make suggestions:
We could meet at the weekend.
You could eat out tonight.
Questions and negatives
We make questions by putting the subject after can/could:
Can I ...? Could I ...? etc. |
Can you ...? Could you ...? |
The negative form is can't in spoken English and cannot in written English.
We sometimes say cannot, but it is very emphatic.
The negative form of could is couldn't in spoken English and could not in written English.
- can and could: possibility 1
- can and could: possibility 2
- can and could: other uses 1
- can and could: other uses 2
Hi brian1010,
Yes, that's right. To say that those things are impossible for them to do, we can use can't or cannot, but not could not.
Using may not is possible, but the meaning is a bit different. May often indicates permission, so if we say They may not come by car, it means 'they cannot come by car because they don't have permission'. This usage of may not is also quite formal and emphatic.
Also, it might be confused with the 'not sure' meaning of may. They may not come by car (if there's no other context) would probably be understood as meaning 'I'm not sure whether they'll come by car or not', which is different from They can't come by car. So, I wouldn't recommend using may not for this meaning.
See this page for more explanation and examples about may: https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/english-grammar-reference/may-and-might
Best wishes,
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello brian1010,
Yes, you could use can in your sentence. Could has a distancing effect, making the sentence more hypothetical; can makes the sentence more immediate, as if describing a real situation. The difference is really only one of nuance, however.
I think your sentence about the earthquake may have an error. The phrase '...what might not happen...' seems odd; '...what might happen...' is more likely, I think.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello brian1010,
Yes, somehow we missed your question -- sorry about that!
In both sentences, some might argue that 'would' speaks more of willingness and 'could' speaks more of ability, but in most cases, both forms would be correct and mean the same thing.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Ballou1982
The first one implies that the main thing is whether you can or cannot come today. You don't know yet if something might stop you from coming. For example, if your friend has invited you to visit him, but you think you will have to work, you could say this because if you have to work, you can't visit your friend.
The second one is less specific. It just says that perhaps you will come or perhaps you will not. It could be due to work, it could be because you don't want to, it could be anything, really, that prevents you from coming.
Hope this helps.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello GIRIKUMAR,
As far as I am aware, there is no difference in meaning. Later on is a little more informal.
Later is often used as an informal way of saying goodbye, with the same meaning as See you later.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello GIRIKUMAR,
I don't think there is a difference in meaning. Rather, there are certain typical patterns of use.
We tend to use fail in with words related to trying something: fail in your attempt, fail in your plan.
We tend to use fail at with activities: fail at the task, fail at the final test
I think fail on its own, or fail to [verb] are much more common forms, however.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello GIRIKUMAR,
Myself can be used in several ways, as you show.
I did it myself (nobody else helped me) - this means that I did the task and nobody helped me; I did it alone.
I did it to myself (and nobody else was to blame) - this is generally used to describe unfortunate situations and it means that the speaker blames him- or herself; nobody else is responsible.
I did it for myself (not for you) - this is generally used to describe positive situations and it means that the speaker's motivation was their own benefit rather than the need or wish of someone else.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Girikumar
The first one is correct because we use 'to' to speak about a destination. I'm assuming that 'function' here means 'a social event', as otherwise I wouldn't really understand what these sentences mean.
Thanks! Hope you also are doing well.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Girikumar
I'd probably say 'in' here, but I think both 'in' and 'at' are fine. As far as I know, there's no difference in meaning between them.
There's a good explanation of the differences in use between the most commonly used prepositions of place on this page if you're interested.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Girikumar
Could you please search our site for an appropriate page to ask your questions? For example, in this same Verbs section, there is a page called 'will' and 'would'. I expect the explanation there will answer question, but if not, please feel free to ask us. We just ask that you try to ask your question on a relevant page.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello GIRIKUMAR,
As far as I am aware there is no difference in meaning between sure of and sure about. I don't know of any context where only one would be correct, though there are certain phrases where one is preferred, such as when using a reflexive pronoun (sure of yourself rather than about).
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Abhinav,
In most contexts, the sentences can be used interchangeably.
Can carries the meaning of 'has the ability to', so you could imagine a situation in which you want to stop a person getting the ability to kill. For example, you might want to act so that someone is prevented from getting hold of a weapon which would make it possible for him to kill you.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Dayan
In the first sentence, 'can' seems to be used to give permission to someone. The second sentence seems a little odd to me (I think I'd say 'do' instead of 'can'), but I suppose it's describing an ability. In the third sentence, I'd say it's speaking about possibility.
Hope that helps!
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello GIRIKUMAR,
While could can function as the past form of can when describing ability (I can swim vs I could swim), here you are using them for (im)possibility. In this use, they are interchangeable in many contexts. However, can't have is generally used for more recent contexts and couldn't have for ones further back in time.
You can read more about this in the discussion on this page:
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/141589/cant-have-been-vs-couldnt-have-been
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Aniyanmon,
The sentence does not look correct to me. You could say either of these:
He could come here yesterday is incorrect because it implies some kind of time travel: a present or future possibility (He could come here) with a past event (yesterday).
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello japezuela,
I think would not be able to... is far more likely in any context I can think of. Did you have a particular context in mind?
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi japazuela,
In that situation we would use either 'able to' or 'could', but not both together:
The only time we might use 'could' and 'able to' together is when we are using 'could' to talk about possibility rather than ability. In other words, 'could not be able to' might mean 'it is possible that [he/she] would not be able to...'
However, it is hard to think of a situation where we would use such a form, and I think other less ambiguous forms would be preferred in any case, such as 'could be unable to', 'might not be able to' or 'might lose the ability to'.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello gullu_summi
No, I'm afraid that's not correct. 'can' is a modal auxiliary verb and so 'do' is not used in a question. The correctly formed question would be 'Can AMS lead to death?'. I'd suggest you read our Question forms page for more on this grammar.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Garry301,
The correct form is 'could' because you are talking about a hypothetical situation (I could eat a horse if you gave me one) rather than a physical ability (I can eat a horse because I've got an enormous stomach).
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Ali. Chy
No, I'm afraid that's not correct. I'm not completely sure what you want to say, but 'If she is single, I could marry her' is grammatically correct and logical.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Sheena virmani
Those are all fine, but I would recommend 2 -- it's probably the most common way to phrase a request like this. Or if you want to be more formal, 1 is more appropriate.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team