Level: beginner
The past continuous is made from the past tense of the verb be and the –ing form of a verb:
I was |
working etc. |
We use the past continuous to talk about the past:
-
for something which happened before and after another action:
The children were doing their homework when I got home.
Compare: The children did their homework when (= after) I got home.
This use of the past continuous is very common at the beginning of a story:
The other day I was waiting for a bus when …
Last week, as I was driving to work, …
- for something that happened before and after a specific time:
It was eight o'clock. I was writing a letter.
Compare: At eight o'clock I wrote (= started writing) some letters.
- to show that something continued for some time:
My head was aching.
Everyone was shouting.
- for something that happened again and again:
I was practising every day, three times a day.
They were meeting secretly after school.
They were always quarrelling.
- with verbs which show change or growth:
The children were growing up quickly.
Her English was improving.
My hair was going grey.
The town was changing quickly.
We do not normally use the past continuous with stative verbs. We use the past simple instead:
When I got home, I really needed (NOT
was needing) a shower.
- Past continuous
- Past continuous and past simple
Level: intermediate
Past continuous and hypotheses
We can also use the past continuous to refer to the present or future in hypotheses (when we imagine something). See these pages:
Hello waza1000,
This depends on the context but I think these are the most likely options:
If you still go to the club: I have been going to the club for 5 months.
If you no longer go to the club: I went to the club for 5 months / I was going to the club for 5 months. [the meaning is the same; was going emphasises that you knew it was a temporary situation]
If you still go to the club: I have been going to the club for 5 months.
I have gone to the club for 5 months is not correct.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
is this correct
when i lived in England, i had taken a course on english grammar
when i had been living in England, i took a course on english grammar
Hello Qirat2004,
It really depends on the situation, but I'm afraid that these are probably not correct. If you are now living somewhere else, lived in England for a time in the past, and took a course on English grammar before you lived in England, you could say, for example: 'Before living in England, I had taken a course on English grammar'.
Does that express what you mean?
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Is it correct to say that while i was living in England i was taking a course: when i lived in England i was taking a course. P.S. i am not living there any more
Hi yyyyyyyy7,
Yes, both of those sentences are correct and they have the meaning that you said.
Using the past continuous (was taking a course) means that the course lasted the whole of the length of your stay in England (i.e., you started living in England when the course started, and you left England when the course ended).
In comparison, if you say While I was living in England, I took a course ("took" = past simple), the course could last the whole of your stay in England, or it could be just one part of your stay.
Jonathan
LearnEnglish team
The first sentence is accurate if.... you no longer live in English but when you did, you had taken a course.
The second sentence doesn't indicate the right timing. The course should be further in the past than living in English....I had been taking a course on English grammar when I was living in England.
Hello!
Could you,please, explain this sentence: 'I was going to meet my friend while it was raining' Can we say that these are two actions in the Past Continous tense, although 'was going to' is future time expressed in the Past?
Hi Nora Kirts,
Yes, I would probably understand the sentence as two past continuous actions. In this sense, "I was going" shows an action in progress (i.e., I was walking, driving or moving in some other way), not future time in the past.
The future time meaning is different. That shows the person's plan or intention, rather than an action in progress. So, it might make sense for the person to say that they were planning to meet the friend while it was raining, but it's a bit unusual (why would they only plan to meet as long as it was raining?).
I hope that helps.
Jonathan
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi breezyabdo,
Both versions are gramatically possible, but only one logically fits the context.
We can use past simple with a past continous form to show an event which happens in the middle of another event:
We can use two past continuous forms when two events occur at the same time and continue:
Now, in your context if you use a past simple (my father read a book) it would suggest that in the time you were watching TV he started and finished a book. It's possible that he's a super-fast reader, or that it is a very short book, but it's more likely that these were two ongoing events rather than one happening entirely during another.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello DaniWeebKage,
You can find our pages on the use of the past perfect here:
https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/english-grammar-reference/perfect-aspect
https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/english-grammar-reference/past-perfect
https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/english-grammar-reference/talking-about-the-past
As you'll see from the information on those pages, we use perfect forms, whether present, past or future, when the earlier event has an influence on the later event. It's not only a question of sequence, but of relevance. If the earlier event affects the later situation in some important way, then we link them using a perfect form.
For example:
You can see from this that the context and intent of the speaker is key.
I won't comment directly on your examples as they contain a few errors and the very 'wear' (rather than 'put on' or 'take') is problematic and would need a very long explanation of a very unlikely context.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello a1981z,
If this is from a test or exercise, 'was talking' is probably the intended answer. This means that they were talking at the same time they were going home -- both actions are happening together.
If the verb were 'talked', it would be odd (though not impossible I think) because the talking happens in the time he was going home, though not during the whole action of going home.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello shahed dalloul,
In 1, 'was watching' is the correct answer. The actions are simultaneous and when each finishes is not indicated.
In 2, 'will probably' is less certain than 'may well', so I'd say 'will probably' is a better answer since it begins with 'I'm not sure'.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hi Samin,
The original sentence is a prediction about the future. If you want to maintain that meaning but move the time into the past, then would is the best option:
(I think that ) Anike will win the prize.
(I thought that) Anika would win the prize.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello DaniWeebKage,
The second one is correct as we consider opening a cupboard door to be an instantaneous action. Nothing falls out when the door is shut; things fall out once it is open, not during the process of opening.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Ahmed Imam,
Yes, that's fine. Depending on the situation, 'my mother was cooking' could also be correct.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Ahmed Imam,
2 focuses on the fact that both actions were happening at the same time. 1 could suggest that you were already reading when your mother started cooking and that she finished before you did.
You can read a little more about the use of these two tenses together on our Past continuous and past simple page.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Samin,
These sentences represent an opative mood in terms of meaning, but English does not represent this with any particular form. Rather, certain constuctions carry an opative meaning, such as the examples you give.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello AsahiYo20,
You could make the argument that was lying suggests the pen is not normally in that place, while lay suggests the opposite. However, I think in most contexts the two forms can be used interchangeably and it's really more a question of style and speaker preference.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello karina120,
Thank you for the comment. We'll make a note of this for when we next update the page. In the meantime, if you have any questions about how to form the negative or question then we'll be happy to explain, of course.
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Guan Lin,
Yes, it could, though normally if we want to include the idea that an action continued until the present moment, we'd use a present perfect continuous form ('He's been writing a book'). But it could be that we speak of as being in progress in the past ('He was writing a book when he was on holiday') does continue until the present moment.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Rikimaru,
The continuous aspect doesn't focus on the beginning or end of an action, but of course a past continuous form refers to a past action, which by definition occurred before now.
What I was trying to say was that an action that we speak about in the past can also conceivably continue into the present, even if we don't speak about it that way. In other words, we can speak about an action as only existing in the past, but in fact later on we can discover that, or think of it, as something that is still happening. Verb tenses always show the perspective of the person who uses them, not necessarily the complete reality.
For example, I could say 'My friend Chris was living in Vietnam last summer', which refers only to last summer in whatever the context is. But it could be true that he is still living in Vietnam now, it's just that my first statement wasn't about the present -- it was about the past.
I'm sorry for the confusion. If what I said doesn't make sense, I wouldn't worry about it too much -- it's an unusual and not very important point.
All the best,
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello ASTeacher
The verb is in the passive voice and the past simple tense. If you have any questions after reading the explanation on the page I linked to, please let us know.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello annanovich
It depends on the context or the way you are thinking about last year, but probably it would be best to use a past simple form ('I skated' or 'I went skating') here. If you tell us more about what comes before and after this sentence (in the book or conversation), we could tell you with more certainty.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello justsomeran
You could use a past simple form in those gaps and have a grammatically correct sentence. Please note, however, that the instructions make it clear that you should write the verb forms that were used in the previous exercise. In the previous exercise, the correct answer was the past continuous form.
Does that make sense?
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Ahmed Imam
Yes, you can, though the past simple is also possible here. Which form is better depends on how you see the action or the reason you are mentioning it.
For example, if you were explaining the things you used to do in your free time when you lived in Sharm El-Sheikh (and you now live somewhere else), it would make more sense to say 'sunbathed', since that's a period of time that is now over.
On the other hand, if you a friend observed that you are now very pale, whereas before you used to be quite tan, the correct choice would be the past continuous form because in this case you are explaining the background to another statement.
I hope this helps you make sense of it.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Anubhav
Yes, that sentence is grammatically correct, though please note the correct spelling is 'haven't' instead of 'have'nt'.
All the best
Kirk
The LearnEnglish Team
Hello Aladin710,
This page deals with the meaning of the past continuous. You can find information about forming negatives of all verb forms on this page:
https://learnenglish.britishcouncil.org/english-grammar-reference/questions-and-negatives
As it says on that page, we make negatives by adding 'not' after the first part of the verb:
Peter
The LearnEnglish Team